Election 2008: If You Had To Vote Today...., Which poison would you swallow?

Choose your President

  • Total voters
    0
#28
#28
I heard from a friend of a friend that John Gruden owns some property in the DC area......add him to the list.
 
#29
#29
MG1968 said:
Savage is too homophobic and too willing to go into someone's bedroom and legislate how they should live their lives.

I'm waiting for Boortz 2012.
Click to expand...
Savage isn't willing to go into anybody's bedrooms. He just criticizes the gay community a lot.

Criticism doesn't equal being nosy... Heck, the gay community speaks out of both sides of their mouths anyways. On the one hand, they want their sex lives kept private and don't feel that anyone should judge them based on what they do in the bedroom. Then on the other hand, they come out and identify themselves as "gay", which is purely based on who they sleep with and parade around (litterally) and expect the general public to accept their lifestyle and embrace them simply based on what they do in the bedroom.

The gay community can't have it both ways. Either you are proud to be openly gay and have to take the good with the bad (praise vs criticism), or they should just keep quiet about who they choose to sleep with and nobody would be the wiser about it and they wouldn't have any fear of being discriminated against.
 
#30
#30
Criticism is one thing, Savage isn't critical, he's downright mean. I listen to Savage on occasion and I find I agree with him on many things like immigration and liberalism in general. I think a President Savage would go out of his way to create policy that's openly hostile to alternative lifestyles. The libertarian in me finds that more than just a little bit scary.

USATODAY.com - MSNBC fires Michael Savage after anti-gay comments

Savage was taking viewer phone calls about airline horror stories, and a male caller began talking about smoking in the bathroom.

"Half an hour into the flight, I need to suggest that Don and Mike take your ..." the caller said, before he was cut off and his words became unintelligible.

"So you're one of those sodomists. Are you a sodomite?" Savage asked.

The caller replied: "Yes, I am."

"Oh, you're one of the sodomites," Savage said. "You should only get AIDS and die, you pig. How's that? Why don't you see if you can sue me, you pig. You got nothing better than to put me down, you piece of garbage. You have got nothing to do today, go eat a sausage and choke on it."

He asked for another phone caller who "didn't have a nice night in the bathhouse who's angry at me today."

These bums "mean nothing to me," he said.
Click to expand...
 
#32
#32
MG1968 said:
Criticism is one thing, Savage isn't critical, he's downright mean. I listen to Savage on occasion and I find I agree with him on many things like immigration and liberalism in general. I think a President Savage would go out of his way to create policy that's openly hostile to alternative lifestyles. The libertarian in me finds that more than just a little bit scary.

USATODAY.com - MSNBC fires Michael Savage after anti-gay comments
Click to expand...

Yeah... that means he's gonna round up all of the gays and put them in concentration camps. How could I not see that coming. :crazy:

If you call marriage being defined as being between a man/woman as being openly hostile, then I really think you need to pull back on the reins a bit.
 
#33
#33
Rasputin_Vol said:
If you call marriage being defined as being between a man/woman as being openly hostile, then I really think you need to pull back on the reins a bit.
Click to expand...

So you wouldn't characterize this as being openly hostile?

"Oh, you're one of the sodomites," Savage said. "You should only get AIDS and die, you pig. How's that? Why don't you see if you can sue me, you pig. You got nothing better than to put me down, you piece of garbage. You have got nothing to do today, go eat a sausage and choke on it."
Click to expand...
 
#34
#34
MSNBC...They are a joke anyways. Does anyone watch MSNBC? :whistling: I wonder why?
 
#40
#40
Here's what disturbs and disgusts me. We are choosing, as the topic says, the preferred poison. We are voting for the lesser of evils instead of the best candidate. Does anybody else see this as a bad thing? It may be merely syntax to some, but I think it is 100% true. We want the person that will cause the least damage instead of the one that will do the most good. And those are two very different things.
 
#41
#41
People say that every single election cycle. I honestly never feel that way.
 
#43
#43
superdave1984 said:
Here's what disturbs and disgusts me. We are choosing, as the topic says, the preferred poison. We are voting for the lesser of evils instead of the best candidate. Does anybody else see this as a bad thing? It may be merely syntax to some, but I think it is 100% true. We want the person that will cause the least damage instead of the one that will do the most good. And those are two very different things.
Click to expand...

People like that have the good sense not to run for President and for the most part stay out of politics altogether.
I may not cast a vote for President at all this time around. I'll vote for the local and state candidates, but I won't make any selection for POTUS, other than to write in Floppy the Banjo Clown.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top