iluvsmesumdooley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,238
- Likes
- 614
Why do you call it UGa's best season in 4 decades?
I assume you refer to the 2017 season: 13-2 (.867), 7-1 in conference, SEC Champs, won the Rose Bowl in round 1 of the CFP, lost round 2.
But just a decade and a half earlier, in 2002, under Richt, UGa went 13-1 (.928), 7-1 in conference, SEC Champs, won the Sugar Bowl.
Sure, the 2002 team didn't get to the CFP...but that's only because the CFP didn't exist then. If it had, they'd probably have been in it, with a chance to go 14-1 and a national title. That is potential the '17 squad can't claim, because they were tested and lost.
Objectively, the '02 team had a better win % (.928 compared to .867). In all other comparable ways, they were equal: 7-1 in conference, conference champs, and won a major bowl (Sugar vs Rose). Sure, the '17 team ended the season #2 while '02 ended #3, but the '02 team could have ended the year #1 if the CFP had existed back then. So they actually had more potential.
All in all, I'd call the '02 squad the better result. But, it's your team, and folks don't like hearing that the guy they fired might be as good as or better than the guy they hired. So you do you, dawg.
Still, Richt 2.0 might be right.
Bingo. And like I said, Jawja should be THE premier team in the SEC. They have a large, football mad population (considerably bigger than Bammer) with no major in-state rival. I don’t wanna hear that Saban bullsheez - no excuses for the Pups. Kirby is Richt 2.0. End of story. If he doesn’t like my smack, then he can go get a natty.