RockyTop85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2011
- Messages
- 13,266
- Likes
- 7,195
The letter in OCI's link explains it.
Explains the University explanation to ESPN as to why they didn't investigate? Well of course ESPN should just take them at their word because a college athletic program would never lie to cover up sexual assault. I'm not saying that they did, but I know if I represented a news organization or that was my child, that letter wouldn't be enough.
1) I think you're losing sight of what you're arguing against. I'm saying it's complicated, not that MU is in the right.
2) Selectively gullible is still gullible. ESPN is what it it is.
3) Did you even read the email? MU says the people who could have done something about it didn't know until it was too late and since they've been made aware of it the family and ESPN have stonewalled them.
I don't believe that is true, if someone has reasonable cause to believe a crime has taken place. There is no kind of HIPAA health care privacy concerns that would override criminal justice. Privacy and anonymity can be maintained, at least during investigative phases.
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! The posters who stated otherwise is incorrect! If a rape was reported to college medical authorities they have a duty and obligation under Clery and Title IX to report it immediately! Without question!
You are ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! The posters who stated otherwise is incorrect! If a rape was reported to college medical authorities they have a duty and obligation under Clery and Title IX to report it immediately! Without question!
Healthcare providers are generally exempt from requirements to report such crimes and also are bound by medical privacy laws.
All due respect you do not know what you are talking about. Providing confidential counseling is not related to reporting a criminal offense as defined under Title IX or the Clery Act. There are some exceptions, as defined under Clery, but medical professionals (college nurses and doctors) are not covered. You miss the whole point of the Clery Act and speak with ignorance.This is going to be huge news to hundreds of major universities AND their in-house counsel, including the University of Tennessee, who offer confidential medical treatment and counseling to the victims of sexual assault.
It's also going to be news to ESPN.
From the article:
Do a quick google search or walk down to the health center on UT's campus and I guarantee you can find a university that offers confidential medical treatment and counseling for sexual assault victims.
It's a tragic story, but it's a bit more complicated than this knee jerk reaction. This girl had a voice, she could have called the police, there's a reason she didn't, a lot of women don't. Reporting it might have made her life better, or it might have made her life worse. It's not cut and dry, life usually isn't.
Acting like the University is to blame for this girl's death is a simple minded, knee-jerk reaction to drinking the OTL kool aid, IMO.
All due respect you do not know what you are talking about. Providing confidential counseling is not related to reporting a criminal offense as defined under Title IX or the Clery Act. There are some exceptions, as defined under Clery, but medical professionals (college nurses and doctors) are not covered. You miss the whole point of the Clery Act and speak with ignorance.
Go read page 72 of The Handbook for Campus Crime Reporting and you will see who is exempt. If the facts are as ESPN reported, Missouri has some issues with Clery and Title IX. What you stated above is correct but that is not the facts of the Missouri case.
-20 USC § 1092(10) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the reporting or disclosure of privileged information.