CA_Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 6,606
- Likes
- 17,410
Something about the ESPN 300. Never bothered to figure it out tho.I realize recruiting evaluations or a subjective process, but how in the world does ESPN rate our class 18th while Rivals has us 7th and 247 9th?
I know the easy answer is they are just lame, but how can there be that significant a discrepancy?
You have to look it player by player. There is a big discrepancy on HB as one example.I realize recruiting evaluations or a subjective process, but how in the world does ESPN rate our class 18th while Rivals has us 7th and 247 9th?
I know the easy answer is they are just lame, but how can there be that significant a discrepancy?
I realize recruiting evaluations or a subjective process, but how in the world does ESPN rate our class 18th while Rivals has us 7th and 247 9th?
I know the easy answer is they are just lame, but how can there be that significant a discrepancy?
Their “recruiting experts” don’t watch any film and they literally only judge players based off of the flash & dash they bring and word of mouth from their yankee colleagues. They don’t pay attention whatsoever. Rivals and 247 both do a fantastic job of evaluating. Just so happens our coaches do an even more fantastic job at evaluating & determining what they want in a player.Something about the ESPN 300. Never bothered to figure it out tho.
Yeah they don’t reevaluate at the end of the year either, that’s true. They don’t took into account the improvement from junior to senior year.
I 110% agree with you on that. I think espn should just stay out of it til signing day is over with anyway. As large as their corporate structure is, they’re lazy and slow when it comes to actually showing things for what they are. Sometimes I’ll look on Bleacher Report and find out things much more quickly. Breaking news stories and junk at least a full five to ten minutes sooner.As long as ESPN sticks to that, 247 needs to exclude them from the composite, imo.
Interesting stats but weird way of saying 4 of the top 5 and 7 of the top 10 players. Would be interesting to maybe see percentage of their top 300 vs rivals and 247 by location for a broader sample size.ESPN ranks northern and western talent much higher. 80% of the Top 5 and 70% of the Top 10 players are from non SEC states. That doesnt jibe with reality...