Eye Opening Article on Taxes

#1

T-TownVol

Keep America Great
Lab Rat
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
19,804
Likes
6,832
#1
Why Your Tax Bill Might Surge Next Year

by Bob Jennings
Wednesday, November 9, 2011


In a recent tax planning meeting with one of our clients, we shocked them with what their income tax future looked like for 2013 if -- on the off-chance -- Congress continues to do nothing to provide a long-term permanent set of tax laws.

They had no idea what tax breaks were expiring this year and next year, and how much it would cost them personally in extra income tax. But they aren't alone, many Americans and even tax professionals aren't aware that their tax bill could rise dramatically next year.

These clients are your average American family and their situation is a good example of the law changes that will affect all of us. Here's their tax situation with a table summarizing the expiring tax laws that are scheduled to occur in 2011 and 2012.

Meet the Smiths: 26-year-olds Bill and Joan have been married for five years and have two young children. Bill earns about $65,000 a year in sales and Joan has gone back to work and earns about $35,000 annually. Bill owes quite a bit on his college student loans and will pay about $3,000 in interest on them in 2013. With Joan working again, they are paying $3,000 for year-round child care. Joan inherited some AT&T stock from her grandmother, which pays her $1,000 in dividends every year. Finally, counting home mortgage interest, they have about $20,000 in itemized deductions.

The first big change affecting the Smiths will be a combined increase in income tax rates, and a tightening of tax brackets as a result of the expiration of the Bush tax cuts. We estimate this will cost them $960 in 2013.

Bill will lose the complete deduction of his student loan interest in 2013, costing about $840. The pair's allowable deduction for child care will drop to $2,400 from $3,000, and they will also see their credit for children drop in half, costing another $1,000.

The marriage tax penalty will come roaring back to hit the Smiths in 2013, costing an estimated $500. The tax on their dividend income will go increase to $280 from $150, adding another $130. Finally, although we did not calculate the effect, without Congressional action to once again "fix" the alternative minimum tax, the Smiths could owe this ugly tax as well!

Luckily for the Smiths — but not for many Americans — other major changes for 2013, which do not personally affect them, include a phase out of itemized deductions and personal exemptions if their income starts to climb.

In summary, because of tax laws expiring this year and next, we estimate that the Smiths will owe $3,598 more in income tax in 2013 than in 2011 with no change in their income.

Major Individual Income Tax Benefits Expiring 12/31/2011:

• Personal tax credits applied against income tax no longer apply


• Higher alternative minimum tax exemptions revert back to extraordinarily-low thresholds


• $250 school teacher expense deduction ends


• Mortgage insurance premium deduction expires


• State and local sales tax deductions expire


• Tuition and related fees deduction end


• IRA to charity tax-free transfers stop


• 2% Social Security tax reduction ends


Major Individual Income Tax Benefits Expiring 12/31/2012:

• Marriage penalty equalization ends


• Dividends taxed at capital gains rates removed, taxed at regular rates now


• Capital gains low tax rates expires


• Removal of itemized deduction phase out for higher income Americans


• Removal of personal exemption phase out for higher income Americans


• Child care deduction limit of $3,000 reverts to $2,400


• Child credit reduces from $1,000 per child to $500 per child


• Low 10% tax bracket for low income Americans is eliminated


• Lower income tax rates and smaller brackets expires


• Refundable adoption credit and reduced deduction


• American Opportunity college education credit expires


• Major reduction in earned income credits and refunds


• Income tax exemption for debt forgiven on home foreclosures and repossessions


• Deduction for student loan interest ends


• Education IRA limit drops from $2,000 to $500


Bob Jennings is a CPA, EA and CFP and author of "Understanding Social Security & Medicare."

___

This is why the administration harps on "tax the wealthy", they do not want the real impact to be discussed. The middle class will get hammered in the next two years.
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
Bump.......there are really no comments to be made on this article...... 75 people have read, more should.
 
#3
#3
Bump.......there are really no comments to be made on this article...... 75 people have read, more should.

You have to raise taxes if you want the government involved in the personal lives and private transactions of all individuals.
 
#5
#5
sounds like Bill has way too much Student Loan debt, and they need to DRIP the T stock or liquidate it and pay off the Student Loan debt.

But the Dems think that raising Taxes on dividends and capital gains hurts only the rich which is the biggest lie. It hurts the baby boomer generation the most, and they are the one living on tight fixed incomes. Hence the reason why Obama is stinking up the polls in FL
 
Last edited:
#7
#7
The Bush tax cuts should be repealed for those making over $250,000 a year and capital gains tax rate should be raised to match equivalent personal income tax rate corresponding to amount earned. Passive, or investment income, should be treated in terms of taxation as though it were earned at a job.

Could then afford to continue the deductions and breaks mentioned above for the middle class and perhaps lower the debt in the same process.
 
#12
#12
so much for Dems caring about the middle class. Just pad their account so they can continue to buy votes off the poor and ignorant
 
#13
#13
so much for Dems caring about the middle class. Just pad their account so they can continue to buy votes off the poor and ignorant


Ummmm ... you do realize that most of those items are tax breaks and deductions scheduled to automatically end unless re-adopted, right? And that many of those were passed with those sunsetting provisions by Republicans ...

Presumably, you are also aware that it is the Republican controlled House that stands in the way of renewing a number of these because they'd rather give more breaks to their fat-cat owners than continue some measure of hope for the middle class.
 
#14
#14
Ummmm ... you do realize that most of those items are tax breaks and deductions scheduled to automatically end unless re-adopted, right? And that many of those were passed with those sunsetting provisions by Republicans ...

Presumably, you are also aware that it is the Republican controlled House that stands in the way of renewing a number of these because they'd rather give more breaks to their fat-cat owners than continue some measure of hope for the middle class.

The point of the article is that the middle class is going to get slammed by THIS administration. Blame is not the issue, deception by the POTUS is.
 
#15
#15
Ummmm ... you do realize that most of those items are tax breaks and deductions scheduled to automatically end unless re-adopted, right? And that many of those were passed with those sunsetting provisions by Republicans ...

Presumably, you are also aware that it is the Republican controlled House that stands in the way of renewing a number of these because they'd rather give more breaks to their fat-cat owners than continue some measure of hope for the middle class.

stands in the way? Where are they saying to let these go away? When was the mortgage deduction set to expire?

Also how can the Dems claim to be working for the middle class and allow this to happen?

The gov't has plenty of our money to operate and do the things they are supposed to do. Quit stealing more
 
#16
#16
The point of the article is that the middle class is going to get slammed by THIS administration. Blame is not the issue, deception by the POTUS is.


You moron, the administration favors continuing the tax breaks for the middle class. Its the GOP-controlled House that wants to sock it to the middle class and reduce taxes on the wealthy.
 
#17
#17
You moron, the administration favors continuing the tax breaks for the middle class. Its the GOP-controlled House that wants to sock it to the middle class and reduce taxes on the wealthy.
please provide a link to the Obama admin asking for these provisions to all be extended. I'm sure there must be stories about it all over (maybe try MSNBC)
 
#23
#23
Ummmm ... you do realize that most of those items are tax breaks and deductions scheduled to automatically end unless re-adopted, right? And that many of those were passed with those sunsetting provisions by Republicans ...

why are the sunsetting provisions there? Dems insisted on them

Presumably, you are also aware that it is the Republican controlled House that stands in the way of renewing a number of these because they'd rather give more breaks to their fat-cat owners than continue some measure of hope for the middle class.

or you could say Dems stand in the way because they insist they will not extend these without raising taxes on the rich....Rs would happily extend the whole package.

 
#25
#25
I say the best way forward is to extend unemployment benefits indefinitely, increase taxes on all salaries, raise capital gains taxes, add in a value added tax and, of course, while you are at it, go ahead and raise my property taxes as well. I mean, why not, disposable income is over rated anyway.
 

VN Store



Back
Top