CHANGE.
Sure it does. it's all relative.
Did the fact that Bush dodged the draft multiple times and then made the worst foreign policy decision in US history not tell you plenty about that man? Obviously it didn't matter to a majority of voters in the last election.
I'm telling you that this is the standard now for how I make a decision on how I'm going to vote. I want the person I think can best get us out of this mess and start to restore some frickin' decency.
Regardless of whatever else might be true, including what his pastor says or believes, Obama was publicly and stringently opposed to this war from day 1, and has staked his legacy on his ability to get us out and repair our status in the world. Given where we are right now, that tells me plenty about him.
Ha!
Good one. Well played.
Listen, I respect you and OE. And as much as we try to rationalize our decisions, sometimes we can't explain them. They're based on deep emotions that we don't know. But once we make that emotional connection (with a person, a candidate, a team, a player, a brand), we fight like crazy to support and defend them.
I like Obama - other than the reasons I've laid out in this and other threads, I just feel right about him. Maybe it's the fact that I think he can masquerade as many different types of people (Arabs, Muslims, African Americans, Whites...) and actually bring people together. Maybe it's because he's smooth as silk. Maybe it's because he's connecting with people despite the fact that his name is BARACK FREAKING HUSSEIN OBAMA.
You guys don't feel the same way. I wish you did - actually, depending on what state you're from, it might not matter. But here in NC, he needs all the votes he can get on May 6. I'll be one of them. And for the first time in my life I'll feel good about this presidential vote.
Over and out.
I hate that I am going to have to come in and go against a lot of what has been said in here. I see conscripted service as oppressive and evil. It is the very opposite of liberty and the ability to pursue happiness. Therefore, I have a hard time really taking umbrage against those that used their deferment in order to stay out of the Vietnam War (a proxy war, in which the survival of the United States, as is, was never at risk.)
I also see no problem with someone who used their connections in order to stay out of combat, then sending a force of volunteers to a foreign country to fight a war.
Growing up, I was enthralled with the military (Navy, cough, cough). My childhood dream was to be in the service. There are plenty of service men and women who joined because it is something they have always wanted to do. Forcing somebody into the business that we are in, is not the preferred solution.
I would be extremely uncomfortable, and very inefficient in my task, if I was ever forced to be a sniper or an assassin. Somebody who finds their calling in art, business, engineering, etc. might actually be a detriment to our defense, as a nation, when forced to be a trigger puller.
The same people that put down Bush for not going to Vietnam (or accusing him of dodging the draft) are eerily quiet when it comes to Clinton... yet I bet they had no qualms about voting for Bill.
And that's your right, just like it's my right to disagree with every post you've made in this thread.