Facts

#26
#26
wounded mullet said:
He was so full of Canada WIN how could i not be jealous. I mean it's either get adopted by him or Bryan Adams.
Click to expand...

Alex P Keaton would kick Mike Seavers ass

thumbnail.aspx
 
#28
#28
wounded mullet said:
Then make him a dirty but shaken martini afterward.


Dammit, sorry, Parkinson's isn't a laughing matter, disregard my joke.
Click to expand...

oooh those are attempts at jokes..now i get it. i thought you were just blabbering on and on cluttering every thread with non sports related references for 40 year olds for no reason, but you were tryin to be funny! how cute!
 
#29
#29
ochocinco said:
oooh those are attempts at jokes..now i get it. i thought you were just blabbering on and on cluttering every thread with non sports related references for 40 year olds for no reason, but you were tryin to be funny! how cute!
Click to expand...

Have you ever capitalized a word in you're life or is that just "keepin it real"? Not a joke, we serious now.
 
#30
#30
nah, no need. why bother? unless i were tryin to impress someone with my punctuation or wit. you should be grateful i use any punctuation.

ill admit i threw an unprovoked cheapt shot, sorry, my adrenalines up tonight ready for gameday
 
#33
#33
BigPapaVol said:
Would this qualify as rank speculation?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

just something our athletic director alluded, what the journalists have said,and common sense.

So does common sense tell you that NCAA will come down harder on someone who continued to lie or someone who corrected themselves without being pressured?

Here is where logic fails you. When you speculate and try to bash someone when you don't know the facts and just try to guess you will look like a moron... ex. Hat and his conspiracy that Bruce is somehow al Pacino in the godfather

Now when asked a question as such was asked that required speculation, you tend to qualify it with a word such as probably and try to take the facts you know and form a logical conclusion.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#34
#34
tvols75 said:
In the NCAA eyes it could be since there has been no precedent of this before.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
Once he lied to the NCAA, there didn't need to be a precedent.
 
Last edited:
#35
#35
GAVol said:
Once he lied to the NCAA, there didn't need to be a precedent.
Click to expand...

The precedent is he owned up to it without knowing he would be caught is what was indicated yesterday. That's a precedent because there has been no other case of that happening.

We will see how the NCAA rules on it.

Clearer for you now?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#36
#36
tvols75 said:
The precedent is he owned up to it without knowing he would be caught is what was indicated yesterday. That's a precedent because there has been no other case of that happening.

We will see how the NCAA rules on it.

Clearer for you now?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...
My point is that once he lied to the NCAA, all bets are off. Hopefully there's nothing major in their findings because lying to the NCAA is kind of like using up your first 2 strikes and putting a giant target on your back.
 
#37
#37
GAVol said:
My point is that once he lied to the NCAA, all bets are off. Hopefully there's nothing major in their findings because lying to the NCAA is kind of like using up your first 2 strikes and putting a giant target on your back.
Click to expand...

Their findings are basically complete according to the inquiry and the inquiry stated the contacting recruits as the issue. Don't read the crap by hat and others about money, academic records, etc... because it gas no basis.

And like I said we will see if the NCAA sets a precedent that says a coach that goes back to them in a matter of days to tell the truth is the same as a coach who sticks to a lie.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#39
#39
tvols75 said:
You said he got caught then confessed. Once again speculation instead of facts.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

IMO – it does not matter if he came forward first. He knew that he would be caught lying. How long do you think it would take the NCAA to prove it after pulling phone records? He confessed before they found out anyway.
 
#40
#40
VolDad said:
IMO – it does not matter if he came forward first. He knew that he would be caught lying. How long do you think it would take the NCAA to prove it after pulling phone records? He confessed before they found out anyway.
Click to expand...

Like telling ur parents you've been skipping school the night b4 your report card comes out.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#41
#41
VolDad said:
IMO – it does not matter if he came forward first. He knew that he would be caught lying. How long do you think it would take the NCAA to prove it after pulling phone records? He confessed before they found out anyway.
Click to expand...

You do know those burner phones cannot be traced easily and if they did they would have no proof of a coach buying it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top