lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,737
- Likes
- 42,921
Then you didn't google what you posted.
Anyway, how many were articles going off a quote from Clyburn (a Dem using scare tactics to sway voters)?
A bunch.
The birth certificate thing, you are probably right, maybe just some rhetorical favor and that's it. But the Black Panthers investigation is a mortal lock.
I found number 9 interesting. I thought the tea party was mostly about fiscal conservatism and more apathetic about the cultural conservatism.
Google this: "house to investigate birth certificate"
See what happens.
So when the DOJ ignores REAL racist activity it should be winked at but the phantoms you seem to see everywhere should be take seriously?It's not hard to read their minds when they announce that what they want to do is vote down health care reform in the first week and then spend the rest of the year doing investigations into Obama's birth certificate and hounding the DOJ about the black panthers.
So when the DOJ ignores REAL racist activity it should be winked at but the phantoms you seem to see everywhere should be take seriously?
All Obama has to do is open his records up like every other President has (save Clinton's medical records). Obama, not some wild-eyed conspiracy theorist, is the one who has kept this going by acting like he has things to hide.
Dear lord.
Great... well thought out... well supported response.
The Black Panthers operate from a racist point of view and engage in racist activities. Why not be honest about it?
Let's look at it this way. Would anyone REALLY put their political career on the line if there weren't questions that have not been answered about Obama? All he has to do is be open. Not hard at all. If there's nothing to hide then the GOP will get egg on their face like Dems did with the Bush NG stuff.
Great... well thought out... well supported response.
The Black Panthers operate from a racist point of view and engage in racist activities. Why not be honest about it?
Let's look at it this way. Would anyone REALLY put their political career on the line if there weren't questions that have not been answered about Obama? All he has to do is be open. Not hard at all. If there's nothing to hide then the GOP will get egg on their face like Dems did with the Bush NG stuff.
So they should not once and for all answer the question about Obama's constitutional eligibility? If he's eligible... why should you or any other Dem care?
As for the other investigations... where were you a when the Dems took over?
As far as that goes... Congress is supposed to overlook the Executive Branch. It is part of their job... a part the recent Dem Congress wholly shirked.
I have "checked" factcheck many times. Like most liberal organizations that address political news, they do three things that cause them to be less than a "sterling standard". One, they take "proof" presented by Dems at face value while viewing GOP "proof" with much harsher skepticism. Two, what they consider "newsworthy" is filtered through a liberal lens. Three, they tend to handwave issues that are damaging to liberals or liberal causes.
True fiscal conservatism is the priority of a minority of the TP. Certainly, for some it is by far the highest priority. But many talk that talk to disguise their real agenda, which is largely social policy, religious fundamentalism, etc.
I'll withhold comment for now, as to not further the perception of ignorance that comes with aligning oneself with religious fundamentalism. I'll be back though, and I'll be prepared when I return.......
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It is ignorant to throw a blanket over religious fundamentalism by calling all fundamentalists (especially a genuine Christian fundamentalist) ignorant.
It probably takes more courage to align one's self with a group that has been wrongly demonized through a concerted propaganda effort....