Family might get billed after kid topples $132K sculpture

[Septic]

I agree, if I’m the insurance rep first thing I wanna know is why a six year old kid could access it. Not even roped off, then again what parents turn their kids loose at functions to be a bother to everyone and everything around them.

An insurance adjuster wouldn't care, it's either covered or it's not (e.g. owned fine arts coverage or in this case personal property of others). Stupidity is a covered peril.

 

[UT_Dutchman]

An insurance adjuster wouldn't care, it's either covered or it's not (e.g. owned fine arts coverage or in this case personal property of others). Stupidity is a covered peril.

Now days you have to idiot-proof everything.

 

[VolFaninFla]

UPDATE:
Family of boy who toppled $132K sculpture won't have to pay

 

[salutethehill]

Aphrodite of Kansas city, sounds like it's worth closer to $1.32 than the $132k the artist claims its worth to him

you uncultured swine

 

[508mikey]

UPDATE:
Family of boy who toppled $132K sculpture won't have to pay

In a way the sculptor was lucky it was broken and he got 99,000, because nobody would have been stupid enough to buy it for that much in the 1st place ... or would they ?

 

[OldandStillaVol]

In a way the sculptor was lucky it was broken and he got 99,000, because nobody would have been stupid enough to buy it for that much in the 1st place ... or would they ?

Agreed. I'm no art critic but compare that piece of junk to this sculpture valued at 100k.

Winston Churchill'''s grandson delivers $100,000 sculpture to Canberra

 

[UT_Dutchman]

In a way the sculptor was lucky it was broken and he got 99,000, because nobody would have been stupid enough to buy it for that much in the 1st place ... or would they ?

Oh you know there's always some da with more money than sense out there who would have bought it.