FBI Thread

#751
#751
NurseGoodVol said:
Frankly BB is a partisan hack who has sold his soul over the msm, dem party and big gov.
Allot of what the 3 letter agencies do is shady and can’t be defended by either side, yet here we are. I’m just shaking my head reading through here.
Click to expand...
That has become an all purpose term for anyone who expresses an opinion that the replying poster doesn't agree with. It's meaningless.
 
#752
#752
vols40 said:
BB is not impressed by your "responsibilities" and thinks if you don't order a pregnancy test on a trans woman then you should be fired for insubordination and your "documentation" is tainted by your political ideology and should therefore be destroyed.
Click to expand...
That is a ridiculous analogy ...
 
#754
#754
NurseGoodVol said:
I can do it anytime an order is questionable as I am a patient advocate and can make the call whether an order is called for or not. We have a few docs who order unnecessary tests and the rationale for not doing them goes in a progress note in the patients EMR. It’s my responsibility to protect the patients and unnecessary spending and I document it.
Click to expand...
You are drawing a false equivalency between completely unrelated fields ... which pose differing responsibilities.
 
#756
#756
BowlBrother85 said:
You are drawing a false equivalency between completely unrelated fields ... which pose differing responsibilities.
Click to expand...
Did you not ask..
Cite a job where an employee can refuse an assignment from a superior, which falls directly within their contractual job description, and face no consequences for it.
I gave it to you straight up. Me, my job and my contract which calls for orders to be noted and completed under the time constraints given in the order by the provider.
Now you want to debate my contract? My ability to use reason and logic to call Bull on certain orders? I face no consequences other than providers learning that needless orders are wasted on me.
You asked and received. Your welcome.
 
#757
#757
NurseGoodVol said:
Did you not ask..
Cite a job where an employee can refuse an assignment from a superior, which falls directly within their contractual job description, and face no consequences for it.
I gave it to you straight up. Me, my job and my contract which calls for orders to be noted and completed under the time constraints given in the order by the provider.
Now you want to debate my contract? My ability to use reason and logic to call Bull on certain orders? I face no consequences other than providers learning that needless orders are wasted on me.
You asked and received. Your welcome.
Click to expand...
That's obviously not the same thing.
 
#758
#758
BowlBrother85 said:
That is a ridiculous analogy ...
Click to expand...


Only ridiculous in your biased mind because it's the exact analogy you used when discrediting whistle blowers who were on the strong but wrong end of the corrupt DOJ with your disgusting assertion that people who were out of options seeking out and taking aid from "sugar daddies" (your exact words) at some point for this country to move on we have to get past that. I understand that you don't like Republicans but are you such a hack that you are afraid of your parties leaders being exposed that your first response is to believe the government at all costs? And just saying in response Trump bad and Kash Patel accusations? Really if you were in a position of extreme vulnerability I mean that if for 6 months the government who may have fired you for no reason and refused to let you pick up your belongings I would not refer to your help from George Soros as that of a Sugar daddy and tell you to cry me a river. But hey that's just me.
 
#759
#759
vols40 said:
Only ridiculous in your biased mind because it's the exact analogy you used when discrediting whistle blowers who were on the strong but wrong end of the corrupt DOJ with your disgusting assertion that people who were out of options seeking out and taking aid from "sugar daddies" (your exact words) at some point for this country to move on we have to get past that. I understand that you don't like Republicans but are you such a hack that you are afraid of your parties leaders being exposed that your first response is to believe the government at all costs? And just saying in response Trump bad and Kash Patel accusations? Really if you were in a position of extreme vulnerability I mean that if for 6 months the government who may have fired you for no reason and refused to let you pick up your belongings I would not refer to your help from George Soros as that of a Sugar daddy and tell you to cry me a river. But hey that's just me.
Click to expand...
The "whitsleblowers" were not only refusing to fulfill assigned duties, they were interfering with ongoing investigations. They were engaging in the very same thing which they now want to accuse their superiors of doing - practicing selective law enforcement, based on the political affiliations of the people under investigation.

If they were true "whistleblowers", they would not have waited until they were disciplined to come forward with their allegations. This is not whistleblowing .... it's retaliation.
 
Last edited:
#760
#760
BowlBrother85 said:
The "whitsleblowers" were not only refusing to fulfill assigned duties, they were interfering with ongoing investigations. They were engaging in the very same thing which they know want to accuse their superiors of doing - practicing selective law enforcement, based on the political affiliations of the people under investigation.

If they were true "whistleblowers", they would not have waited until they were disciplined to come forward with their allegations. This is not whistleblowing .... it's retaliation.
Click to expand...


Like I said if you are comfortable in your virtue signaling and refusal to accept facts and are ok with only the msm narrative and you can sleep with your feelings then that's on you. I will continue to wait for the day of the heavy hands of our two tier justice system returns to the bipartisan days of Republican and democrat leaders coming together and calling the FBI what it is as was the case during the Ruby Ridge investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and rekinhavoc
#762
#762
BowlBrother85 said:
That has become an all purpose term for anyone who expresses an opinion that the replying poster doesn't agree with. It's meaningless.
Click to expand...

You fit the bill without a shadow of a doubt among other hacks on here. Your tds and fear of make believe boogeymen blind you of the corruption you ignorantly and vehemently support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, vols40 and rekinhavoc
#765
#765
NurseGoodVol said:
It appears to be exactly what you asked for.
Click to expand...
It appears that these men were guilty of doing the exact same thing that they now accuse their colleagues in the FBI of doing ... engaging in selective enforcement of the law, based on the political ideologies of the people who were under investigation. They are hypocrites.

... and look how fast this story died, once it was revealed that they had taken money from Kash Patel. Nobody is covering these guys anymore. This was a big swing and a miss by Rep. Jim Jordan. A total bust of a non-scandal.
 
#766
#766
C-south said:
You fit the bill without a shadow of a doubt among other hacks on here. Your tds and fear of make believe boogeymen blind you of the corruption you ignorantly and vehemently support.
Click to expand...
If you cared anything about public corruption ... you wouldn't defend Donald Trump.
 
#767
#767
BowlBrother85 said:
It appears that these men were guilty of doing the exact same thing that they now accuse their colleagues in the FBI of doing ... engaging in selective enforcement of the law, based on the political ideologies of the people who were under investigation. They are hypocrites.

... and look how fast this story died, once it was revealed that they had taken money from Kash Patel. Nobody is covering these guys anymore. This was a big swing and a miss by Rep. Jim Jordan. A total bust of a non-scandal.
Click to expand...


The msm was never going to cover it anyway you tool. Remember the laptop disinformation that wasn't disinformation? Rich I tell you. This will be not different than any other story the state run media ignores. Time will reveal the truth and you bozos will say that is old news no one is covering it. Lol
 
#768
#768
BowlBrother85 said:
If you cared anything about public corruption ... you wouldn't defend Donald Trump.
Click to expand...


Nice whataboutism. Tell me one thing that has been true they have accused him of? Russian collusion? Are you still sporting wood over that hoax?
I can whataboutism you as well.. Why is the FBI not turning over documents that aren't classified that possibly show bribery against a sitting vice president?
 
#770
#770
vols40 said:
The msm was never going to cover it anyway you tool. Remember the laptop disinformation that wasn't disinformation? Rich I tell you. This will be not different than any other story the state run media ignores. Time will reveal the truth and you bozos will say that is old news no one is covering it. Lol
Click to expand...
Grow up.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top