FBI Thread

#103
#103
VOLS INC. said:
He’s right. As we are seeing in this thread as an example. No “I was wrong”. No apology. Just more empty accusations.
Click to expand...

You can see who wanted the accusations to be true. LG, for example, still moaning muh TrumPutin, but doesn’t even mention the players who devised the setup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsAgainstTheWorld15, UT_Dutchman, Orangeburst and 3 others
#107
#107
lawgator1 said:
He'd have a better argument if it wasn't for the fact that Trump did, and continues, to support Putin at every turn.

This needs to be explored and Trump pressed in the issue by others seeking the nomination.
Click to expand...

I think it’s pretty clear to everyone on this board that you are a terrible judge of what is and isn’t a good argument. After being proven wrong once again, rather than admit you were wrong, your argument is “We need to explore why Trump seemingly supports Putin”.

That’s your argument? And you are a lawyer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, VolsAgainstTheWorld15, CobbVol and 4 others
#109
#109
lawgator1 said:
Thats a perfectly rational reason. I'd like to see Trump explain it, that's all.

The guy wants to be President at a very precarious moment in history, particularly for Ukraine and Eastern Europe more generally. It would be incredibly irresponsible not to understand Trump's seeming loyalty to Putin, especially under current circumstances.
Click to expand...
There's a lot I would like for various politicians to explain. Especially Biden since he's the one currently in office. But it's not going to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#111
#111
lawgator1 said:
I think a LOT of people, even Republicans, are alarmed by Trump's constant defense of Putin. There a reason for it. Let's find out what it is. Maybe then we can move on.

But under NO circumstances should Trump be able to avoid answering hard, real, probing questions about it.
Click to expand...

I believe people have more serious concerns and are alarmed with the results of the Durham report.

If any questions should be asked, I'd start with someone else besides Trump at this point. Not a good look for thr MSM and DNC pushing questions such as that immediately after the release of this report.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobbVol, StarRaider, DC_Vol and 1 other person
#113
#113
VOLS INC. said:
I think it’s pretty clear to everyone on this board that you are a terrible judge of what is and isn’t a good argument. After being proven wrong once again, rather than admit you were wrong, your argument is “We need to explore why Trump seemingly supports Putin”.

That’s your argument? And you are a lawyer?
Click to expand...

Anyone who truly believed the Russia drivel is a grade A moron. It was evident early on it was built on a stack of fairytales.

The long-standing question was who exactly was responsible for the hit…for using the power of the US government to destroy a political foe. Durham has pointed the finger (and it’s not really a surprise who is on the other end).

This is the stuff banana republics are made of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Carl Pickens, CobbVol and 4 others
#114
#114
lawgator1 said:
I think a LOT of people, even Republicans, are alarmed by Trump's constant defense of Putin. There a reason for it. Let's find out what it is. Maybe then we can move on.

But under NO circumstances should Trump be able to avoid answering hard, real, probing questions about it.
Click to expand...
At this point I think it's evident why Trump kisses Putins ass. At this point I think it's clear you have gone loony tunes trying to find a nefarious connection. You are seriously troubled like Ras is. Just in a different way. Let me help you.

Trump likes Putin bc Putin kisses his ass. Trump loves authoritarians


Putin loves Trump bc he's easily manipulated and Putin hates Hillary.


Stop with all the nonsense
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol and EasternVol
#115
#115
VOLS INC. said:
I think it’s pretty clear to everyone on this board that you are a terrible judge of what is and isn’t a good argument. After being proven wrong once again, rather than admit you were wrong, your argument is “We need to explore why Trump seemingly supports Putin”.

That’s your argument? And you are a lawyer?
Click to expand...


Yes and yes.

Given the stakes and his past actions and comments in terms of Putin, anything short of fully exploring it until a rational and verifiable explanation is obtained would be the height of irresponsibility.
 
#116
#116
volfanhill said:
At this point I think it's evident why Trump kisses Putins ass. At this point I think it's clear you have gone loony tunes trying to find a nefarious connection. You are seriously troubled like Ras is. Just in a different way. Let me help you.

Trump likes Putin bc Putin kisses his ass. Trump loves authoritarians


Putin loves Trump bc he's easily manipulated and Putin hates Hillary.


Stop with all the nonsense
Click to expand...


If it's that easy for Putin to manipulate him that's not much of a comment for Trump.
 
#118
#118
lawgator1 said:
He'd have a better argument if it wasn't for the fact that Trump did, and continues, to support Putin at every turn.

This needs to be explored and Trump pressed in the issue by others seeking the nomination.
Click to expand...

Yeah, we need just one more investigation. I’m sure they’ll find something this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, VolsAgainstTheWorld15, UT_Dutchman and 6 others
#119
#119
As I read through this thread I am amazed at the utter stupidity going on. There is a point where we have to sit back and ponder. I will leave this here and hope some of you will recognize where you are in this moment:
Screenshot_20230515_201944_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and 825VOL
#120
#120
‘There’s Nothing To This, But We Have To Run It To The Ground,’ Anti-Trump FBI Agent Strzok Said: Durham

‘For F***’s Sake, Man’ — British Intel Laughed At Peter Strzok’s ‘Thin’ Justification For Targeting Trump

peter_strzok_gi.jpg


Days after opening a full FBI investigation into connections between Donald Trump and Russia, lead FBI investigator Peter Strzok told a subordinate that “there’s nothing to this, but we have to run it to the ground,” the subordinate — a top official in the Bureau’s London outpost—told Special Counsel John Durham.

“Dude, are we telling them everything we know, or is there more to this?” the ALAT wrote to a supervisory special agent.

“That’s all we have. Not holding anything back,” the supervisor replied.

“Damn that’s thin,” the ALAT said.

“I know. It sucks,” the supervisor said.

‘There’s Nothing To This, But We Have To Run It To The Ground,’ Anti-Trump FBI Agent Strzok Said: Durham | The Daily Wire
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, AM64 and StarRaider
#123
#123
Franklin Pierce said:
‘There’s Nothing To This, But We Have To Run It To The Ground,’ Anti-Trump FBI Agent Strzok Said: Durham

‘For F***’s Sake, Man’ — British Intel Laughed At Peter Strzok’s ‘Thin’ Justification For Targeting Trump

peter_strzok_gi.jpg


Days after opening a full FBI investigation into connections between Donald Trump and Russia, lead FBI investigator Peter Strzok told a subordinate that “there’s nothing to this, but we have to run it to the ground,” the subordinate — a top official in the Bureau’s London outpost—told Special Counsel John Durham.

“Dude, are we telling them everything we know, or is there more to this?” the ALAT wrote to a supervisory special agent.

“That’s all we have. Not holding anything back,” the supervisor replied.

“Damn that’s thin,” the ALAT said.

“I know. It sucks,” the supervisor said.

‘There’s Nothing To This, But We Have To Run It To The Ground,’ Anti-Trump FBI Agent Strzok Said: Durham | The Daily Wire
Click to expand...

“The FBI’s specialists on Russia had heard nothing about ties between Trump and Russia, making them skeptical. Instead of using Russia experts, the FBI then assigned brand-new intelligence analysts to work the most prominent and politically explosive case in the country.”
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top