lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,458
- Likes
- 42,814
Seems like you’re reading what you want into vs what actually happened. If he wanted them to destroy information and this is only coming out months later, why would he have stopped?
More info just reported:
1) this "accident" occurred shortly after there was a request by the prosecutor for the surveillance video.
2) the phone of the worker who did this has been seized.
3) the worker has been questioned.