BearCat204
Second Chances
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 68,692
- Likes
- 48,969
Not a Hannity fan at all, but from all the remarks made since last nite by their attorneys that doesnt really seem that difficult.
Flipping through the channels and caught about 10 minutes of Hannity absolutely owning Brown's attorney. Wow, that wasn't even fair lol
1) Jurors tend to trust police officer and believe their decisions to use violence are justified, even when the evidence says otherwise.
2) The second is prosecutorial bias: Perhaps prosecutors, who depend on police as they work on criminal cases, tend to present a less compelling case against officers, whether consciously or unconsciously.
3) Ordinarily, prosecutors only bring a case if they think they can get an indictment. n high-profile cases such as police shootings, [prosecutors] may feel public pressure to bring charges even if they think they have a weak case.
Juror bias, prosecutorial bias, weak case.
The word out of Ferguson appears to fit the lattermost of these, but who knows. There are still questions left to be answered and why dont police get indicted in killings? is one of them. So why not go to a trial?
Just because he wasn't indicted doesn't mean he was innocent.
If you were black, had terrible public education, were raised to distrust whites, and were taught that the deck is stacked against you, you would feel very differently about the grand jury's decision.
Yeah there are rioters who just want to loot, but some people actually do care about justice.
At bare minimum, an indictment would have inspired confidence in the Ferguson community that the game wasnt rigged, that due diligence did happen, that police are held to the same standards they are and that they believe black lives matter.