Ferguson Riots

[Vol8188]

So who gets to decide "who's perception matters"? (to borrow the phrase)

One groups perception is that a young man was wrongfully murdered. So they protest that murder. Even if you don't agree that he was wrongfully murdered, you should be capable of understanding this.

The other group protests the funerals of straight soldiers because they are upset with the policies put in place by a president.

You tell me which ones perception makes sense?

 

[BeecherVol]

One groups perception is that a young man was wrongfully murdered. So they protest that murder. Even if you don't agree that he was wrongfully murdered, you should be capable of understanding this.

The other group protests the funerals of straight soldiers because they are upset with the policies put in place by a president.

You tell me which ones perception makes sense?

Neither?

 

[Carl Pickens]

What they perceive as an injustice. It's sad that you had to ask that.

What's sad is the cesspool that place has become

 

[Grand Vol]

The 2012 version doesn't count? That bad?

Like I said, there isn't another version...

Some films should be left alone as cult classics of the time period. Imagine some chowderhead trying to remake Dr. Strangelove in today's context. It just wouldn't fit.

It's something that just can't be recreated with the same conditions as it was then. Hence, there is only one version and that's the 1984 version. And as far as I'm concerned, I'd burn and ban every copy of the 2012 version as a crime against nature and all things good with the world.

 

[Carl Pickens]

One groups perception is that a young man was wrongfully murdered. So they protest that murder. Even if you don't agree that he was wrongfully murdered, you should be capable of understanding this.

The other group protests the funerals of straight soldiers because they are upset with the policies put in place by a president.

You tell me which ones perception makes sense?

They don't give a damn about a "young man" as you say..... They just want to make a spectacle, loot and tear stuff up

 

[Carl Pickens]

One groups perception is that a young man was wrongfully murdered. So they protest that murder. Even if you don't agree that he was wrongfully murdered, you should be capable of understanding this.

The other group protests the funerals of straight soldiers because they are upset with the policies put in place by a president.

You tell me which ones perception makes sense?

Do you think he was wrongfully murdered?

 

[FLVOL69]

Do you think he was wrongfully murdered?

No

 

[508mikey]

No

Neither do I and hopefully they burn the damn city down so there isnt a 2nd anniversary 'march'

 

[Vol8188]

They don't give a damn about a "young man" as you say..... They just want to make a spectacle, loot and tear stuff up

Every single protestor was only there to loot? Try not to go full retard.

 

[Vol8188]

Do you think he was wrongfully murdered?

I do not. But that doesn't make me incapable of seeing their perspective.

 

[allvol123]

I do not. But that doesn't make me incapable of seeing their perspective.

The perspective of letting emotions rule logic.

F that.

 

[Vol8188]

The perspective of letting emotions rule logic.

F that.

The perspective of "hey, not all of the unarmed black men killed by cops deserved it"

 

[FLVOL69]

I do not. But that doesn't make me incapable of seeing their perspective.

What perspective is that? Whitey bad ???

 

[FLVOL69]

The perspective of "hey, not all of the unarmed black men killed by cops deserved it"

That's not applicable in this case.

 

[Carl Pickens]

Every single protestor was only there to loot? Try not to go full retard.

I take it you don't like competition

Was he wrongfully murdered? Answer the question..,,

 

[Vol8188]

That's not applicable in this case.

From the perspective of his family and friends, I would say it's 100% applicable.

 

[tumscalcium]

I do not. But that doesn't make me incapable of seeing their perspective.

Nothing quite like the perspective of defending a worthless strong-armed robber that assaults people.

These people are just displaying their stupidity. The media needs to not cover anything there. They'll go away.

 

[allvol123]

The perspective of "hey, not all of the unarmed black men killed by cops deserved it"

They need to pick a better martyr than a thieving bully.

 

[FLVOL69]

From the perspective of his family and friends, I would say it's 100% applicable.

That's too bad, they're wrong.

 

[Vol8188]

Nothing quite like the perspective of defending a worthless strong-armed robber that assaults people.

These people are just displaying their stupidity. The media needs to not cover anything there. They'll go away.

Strong armed robber?

 

[Vol8188]

That's too bad, they're wrong.

I don't disagree, I simply understand their perspective.

 

[FLVOL69]

Strong armed robber?

Yeah He robbed the storekeeper for the blunts before he assaulted the cop.

 

[Vol8188]

Yeah He robbed the storekeeper for the blunts before he assaulted the cop.

But he was not armed.

 

[FLVOL69]

I don't disagree, I simply understand their perspective.

Would be better served protesting in Chicago.

 

[FLVOL69]

But he was not armed.

What the **** do you think strong arm robbery is? He took the ****ing **** and threatened the guy and pushed him away.