I have never heard that as criteria. It's always did he launch? Did he hit head or neck? That's what has been forced down our throats for years. He didn't make contact with head or neck. He assisted on a tackle.
I still think he hit the name plate. I'll watch again and if I'm wrong, I'll concede, but that's how I saw it.ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting. When in question, it is a foul. ...
Yeah I’m going to bump this comment bc anyone that’s seen TCUs season knows what an improbable run this has been. Idk if they’re even one of the four best teams in the country but somehow they get the breaks to go their way most of the time. Hoping their magical run continues next game.Tcu appears to have a rabbits foot with a slew of four leafed clovers shoved up their arse.
That's because they didn't have to play an SEC team all season. We will see what happens next week, unless they luck out and get Ohio State.Yeah I’m going to bump this comment bc anyone that’s seen TCUs season knows what an improbable run this has been. Idk if they’re even one of the four best teams in the country but somehow they get the breaks to go their way most of the time. Hoping their magical run continues next game.
I understand your point, but it's not "selectively" being applied. It is subjectively being applied, and that's the case for likely a majority of rules in football (e.g. pass interference, holding, a catch or not a catch, a fumble or not a fumble, etc.).None taken. Remove the rule since it's selectively being applied.