creekdipper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 8,619
- Likes
- 23,188
That brings to mind one upside of CONN's lucky run to survive the last three games. At least the "undefeated in finals" streak will end today.
That is an interesting perspective, UConn has the higher rated players and yet is clearly “not as talented”, so if they win it is only because SC “lost the game”.If he wins it will be because USC lost the game, not because he won it. USC is clearly the more talented team. IMO jury is still out on the X's and O's coaching but the talent will probably be able to overcome mistakes in that department. Will the old guard be officiating? If so, that will not be good for USC.
That is an interesting perspective, UConn has the higher rated players and yet is clearly “not as talented”, so if they win it is only because SC “lost the game”.
You not really going to to try that are you?That is an interesting perspective, UConn has the higher rated players and yet is clearly “not as talented”, so if they win it is only because SC “lost the game”.
Wasn't SC the more talented team when they lost to Mizzou and Kentucky? SC may well win but, your reasoning is flawed.If he wins it will be because USC lost the game, not because he won it. USC is clearly the more talented team. IMO jury is still out on the X's and O's coaching but the talent will probably be able to overcome mistakes in that department. Will the old guard be officiating? If so, that will not be good for USC.
At the time the decision was made I completely agreed with the reasoning. But in hindsight, Dawn's canceling of their home game against CT at CT's weakest point of their season (due to multiple injury losses) turns out may have taken away a valuable mental advantage for SC.
I'm guessing that at that particularly vulnerable point for CT, the Gamecocks very well could have slaughtered CT by 50-plus points, a b!tch-slapping so complete they'd still have nghtmares about it. Which, IMO, could have given SC a little extra mental confidence going into tonight with the memory of such a beatdown still there for them.
Obviously the team they will play tonight looks nothing like the team they would have humiliated in that canceled game, but still ...
It's at least POSSIBLE that CT players would be so focused on revenge that they would press a little too much, and if things started going downhill, then maybe the bench players might start getting nervous as their minds drift back, and maybe the players on the floor start absorbing some of that negative energy.
We'll never know, of course. But I think the lesson to be learned here is that one NEVER, EVER turns down an opportunity to put a humiliating beatdown on Connecticut in front of 18,000 fans in your arena. The memories of that could have come in handy for tonight.
On November 22, 2021, SC beat UConn 73-57 and Uconn had Paige B at the time. Good teams learn to forget everything about the past season and treat the tournament as a new season.
On November 22, 2021, SC beat UConn 73-57 and Uconn had Paige B at the time. Good teams learn to forget everything about the past season and treat the tournament as a new season.
UConn‘s Dorka Juhasz (sp) is out and I think that really hurt them on the inside against Stanford. Stanford would have won if they didn’t shoot bricks ( and it was BAD) from outside. She will be missed even more against SCar.. Without her, UConn doesn’t have a chance unless they shoot at least 40% from the 3.
That was only a 16-point victory, though. And in NOVEMBER. The 50-point clobbering would have occurred toward the end of the season -- a fresher memory.