First round of playoff rankings out

#29
#29
Doubling down I see.

What's Penn St.'s record and ranking compared to Miss St.?

Whatever man. How about #9 Auburn barely beating Vandy? You can spin whatever you want but the fact remains that division games can be dangerous games. We see it every year. The result of this game means nothing. If Washington played a healthy TAMU, who knows who would win. Both are very good teams when healthy.
 
#32
#32
Whatever man. How about #9 Auburn barely beating Vandy? You can spin whatever you want but the fact remains that division games can be dangerous games. We see it every year. The result of this game means nothing. If Washington played a healthy TAMU, who knows who would win. Both are very good teams when healthy.

LOL....except that TAMU will drop in the ranking and not be #4 anymore, and essentially kills their playoff hopes.

So yeah...means aboslutely nothing.
 
#33
#33
Pretty simple concept: you're trying to be a smartass and blast him for a "what if" scenario, and you turn around and are doing the exact same thing genius.

Wrong. He said on a neutral field, Washington would beat TAMU. Where have I said anything close to that?
 
#35
#35
Wrong. He said on a neutral field, Washington would beat TAMU. Where have I said anything close to that?

Are you seriously acting like your "what if" scenarios aren't "anything close to that"?

Also, you saying today's TAMU loss "changes nothing" is about the dumbest thing said in this thread.
 
#37
#37
Are you seriously acting like your "what if" scenarios aren't "anything close to that"?

Also, you saying today's TAMU loss "changes nothing" is about the dumbest thing said in this thread.

Wow. You really cannot handle someone who doesnt drool over Washington huh? Comical.
 
#39
#39
Wow. You really cannot handle someone who doesnt drool over Washington huh? Comical.

You're right...it IS comical that you think TAMU losing to Miss. St. doesn't change anything about whether TAMU should be ranked higher than Washington.
 
#40
#40
Good God indeeed....Baylor is....#17. They aren't #4.

Do you not think Washington is better than Baylor either?

VT barely hangs on to beat a bad Duke team. Continually making you look dumb. You just fail to accept the fact that divisonal games can be very tough for even the best teams.
 
#41
#41
VT barely hangs on to beat a bad Duke team. Continually making you look dumb. You just fail to accept the fact that divisonal games can be very tough for even the best teams.

Cool....too bad that wasn't what we were arguing. We were arguing whether Washington was better and should be ranked higher than Texas A&M....and YOU are the one saying them losing to a 3-5 Miss St. team doesn't change anything.

Do I need to repeat that part, or post it in crayon so you can understand? Or are you going to keep arguing against crap I didn't even say?
 
#42
#42
You're right...it IS comical that you think TAMU losing to Miss. St. doesn't change anything about whether TAMU should be ranked higher than Washington.

Wrong. I said the playoff committee had it right when they ranked TAMU ahead of Washington when they first put their rankings out. You know, before the games were played today. If Washington wins tonight, they absolute should be ranked ahead of TAMU.

But when the first round of playoff rankings were released, TAMU was ranked ahead of Washington. Some said Washington should be ranked ahead of TAMU. I said they shouldnt be and the committee agreed. Now everything is different that TAMU has been beaten.

By the way, I meant the TAMU loss means nothing in the context of if TAMU and Washington were to play. Neither teams wins and losses would mean anything. Either team could beat each other. Both are very good teams.
 

VN Store



Back
Top