VolsSportsFan
Where are the turtles?
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 72,965
- Likes
- 46,024
I agree that the personal foul call was questionable, though we don't know what the Arky player said after the play.
The intereference call was 100 5 correct, not debatable. You simply cannot put both hands on the receiver's chest, push him back, and then claim the ball was underthrown.
I agree that the personal foul call was questionable, though we don't know what the Arky player said after the play.
The intereference call was 100 5 correct, not debatable. You simply cannot put both hands on the receiver's chest, push him back, and then claim the ball was underthrown.
I agree that the personal foul call was questionable, though we don't know what the Arky player said after the play.
The intereference call was 100 5 correct, not debatable. You simply cannot put both hands on the receiver's chest, push him back, and then claim the ball was underthrown.
I agree that the personal foul call was questionable, though we don't know what the Arky player said after the play.
The intereference call was 100 5 correct, not debatable. You simply cannot put both hands on the receiver's chest, push him back, and then claim the ball was underthrown.