I knew a Greg Miclisse reference was eventually coming, haha. Props Volunteer Kirby. For the record, it appears he never signed anywhere despite all the offers he claimed. He was rated #1183 in the 2014 class composite.
I added several decommits from the 2014 and 2015 class. Thanks everyone for contributing. I think there may still be some more but we have a pretty comprehensive list now.
I currently have 4 decommits so far in 2017, 11 from 2016 (5 of which appear to have been recruited over, 3 of which I suspected were but did not include), 5 from 2015 (all appear to have been recruited over), and 10 in 2014 (7 appear to have been recruited over).
We average one player a year that has been recruited over that I wasn't favorable of how the staff handled (Tim Hart 2016, Marques Ford 2015, Kevin Mouhon 2014) -- not that my opinion matters. I still hope the staff improves its timing of when they let some recruits know they should look elsewhere (January & February is much too late IMO). I also think averaging 5-7 recruits a year that are dropped is much too high. I know everyone says it happens everywhere but I doubt any school is that high from 2014-2016. I only follow UT so I cannot say definitively that 5-7 is higher than anywhere else.
Of the decommits we may have encouraged to look elsewhere or simply not tried to retain, the only one that I think could have been a true difference maker at UT given our current roster is Cory Thomas. We need HS DTs with good size and he fits the mold. I think we lost two solid DEs in 2015 but I also think we had an excellent DE haul that year (Kyle Phillips and Darrell Taylor should both develop into stars once their time comes). The other 2015 DE signee (early commit Andrew Butcher that the staff remained loyal to) has an uphill battle to earn playing time and probably lacks the natural build/size to grow into DT.
Overall, the staff has done an exceptional job of culling out the recruits who are less likely to contribute. It's still too early to really grade this ability with certainty, but early signs look very positive. I think picking up John Kelly over Kendall Bussey may be one example in the future that we can really point to as demonstrating their evaluation skill. Time will tell.
I still question why the staff takes so many borderline/questionable commits early but its obvious the staff intends to fill up the class early to create a scarcity of remaining spots in hopes that higher sought players pull the trigger sooner. While I'm not overly fond of this strategy, it certainly worked in 2014 and 2015.
I still think the staff should demonstrate more patience with recruiting and let spots fill as they may. Future leadership capabilities are often demonstrated by players who commit and peer recruit relatively early (before their senior year I suppose). Not every player is willing to do this. If I were a coach, I would keep this in mind when determining playing time if two players were of similar skill set. For example, if Nigel Warrior and Maliek Gray end up having comparable skill set, I would be more inclined to put Gray in the game. That's just an example, as I think Warrior will prove to be solid player and no one will care that he waited to NSD instead of peer recruiting for us. Some kids truly don't know where they want to go until late. Still, I think players who commit early and stay committed (assuming no turnover in staff) demonstrate future leadership qualities. That said, a good portion of the highly sought out players will always wait until late. It's just human nature when you have a multitude of options to choose from with an important decision (think of highly attractive women, wealthy men, and celebrities when it comes to marriage/monogamy -- I know, terrible example lol).