YorkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2010
- Messages
- 19,021
- Likes
- 4,512
They were questioning him in his home. What's wrong with that?
Hell, if it's anything they're good for, it's monitoring a fella.
Of course, it's easier to throw the headcase in the nuthouse.
not at all. No one has any clue why he was committed. All we know is why he was being interviewed. If you would like to believe that he was perfectly rational then that's fine. I personally doubt it really went that way after reading many of his FB posts
Again, what solid basis do they have that he was a real threat? The FBI ceased involvement after he was committed for assessment.
If you went through a psychotic episode of some sort, were picked up by law enforcement and then turned over for assessment and treatment, would you want all the details out there?
Yes, because if they were, that would keep my friends, family, and anyone who heard about it from drawing their own conclusions.
You're killing me Smalls. The folks who matter would know. You and I don't need to know. You wouldn't want some future employer, girlfriend, bank loan officer etc to wave a newspaper article in your face 5 years from now.
'ay Benny, that article would still say I was committed 5 years ago for something. Don't act like full disclosure is the only way the whistle is blown![]()