kptvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 27,294
- Likes
- 1
In fact, I'd wager that at this instant the great majority of people in this country who have a concealed weapons permit have at least one firearm, unattended, in a car or a home and relatively unsecured, at that.
Your point ignores the obvious reality that people with concealed weapons permits do not always have the gun with them. They leave them in closests and in cars all the time.
In fact, I'd wager that at this instant the great majority of people in this country who have a concealed weapons permit have at least one firearm, unattended, in a car or a home and relatively unsecured, at that.
the great majority? anything to back that up?
also, what is the incidence rate for break-ins to cars/homes of permit holders?
seems a bit of a red herring to claim significant risk from permit holders having their guns misappropriated.
Your point ignores the obvious reality that people with concealed weapons permits do not always have the gun with them. They leave them in closests and in cars all the time.
In fact, I'd wager that at this instant the great majority of people in this country who have a concealed weapons permit have at least one firearm, unattended, in a car or a home and relatively unsecured, at that.
Your point ignores the obvious reality that people with concealed weapons permits do not always have the gun with them. They leave them in closests and in cars all the time.
In fact, I'd wager that at this instant the great majority of people in this country who have a concealed weapons permit have at least one firearm, unattended, in a car or a home and relatively unsecured, at that.
Personally, I keep all my kitchen knives in a secure safe in my basement, in case a murderer tries to steal them.
The majority of firearms owned in this country are NOT owned by people with carry permits in the first place. Even if we ARE concerning ourselves only with those that do have such permits I'm rather at a loss as to the relevance of what their weapons are doing when not being carried. What is the practical distinction between a weapon left at home by someone with a carry permit vs and one left at home by someone without?
Apparently leaving a firearm unattended in a car is about the most dangerous thing since the Taliban. And yet, LG is arguing that a law that would prevent such a danger is a bad thing.
Who cares? Guns are worth a lot of money. If I were breaking into someone's house that's something I'd grab.
Or, you could require that people that own guns keep them much more secure than a glove compartment or a console. That might help, too.
If someone steals a car, they're getting the damn gun that's in it, no matter where you put it.
For petty criminals, a gun they can steal and then sell (or use themselves) is as valuable as cash or jewelry.
I defended a case a few years back. A 16 year old kid and his buddies like to break into cars and steal CDs and what not. They do this recreationally, just kids getting into mischief. They aren't career criminals. They are in high school together.
One weekend they go on one of their little sprees and this time they find a handgun.
The next Monday, the kid brings it to school to show off. Long story short he is driving away from the school and his friend is in the back seat looking at it, it goes off, bullet goes through the front seat and into the driver, killing him.
Gun was legal on Saturday. On Monday it killed someone.
Or, you could require that people that own guns keep them much more secure than a glove compartment or a console. That might help, too.
Or, you could require that people that own guns keep them much more secure than a glove compartment or a console. That might help, too.
For petty criminals, a gun they can steal and then sell (or use themselves) is as valuable as cash or jewelry.
I defended a case a few years back. A 16 year old kid and his buddies like to break into cars and steal CDs and what not. They do this recreationally, just kids getting into mischief. They aren't career criminals. They are in high school together.
One weekend they go on one of their little sprees and this time they find a handgun.
The next Monday, the kid brings it to school to show off. Long story short he is driving away from the school and his friend is in the back seat looking at it, it goes off, bullet goes through the front seat and into the driver, killing him.
Gun was legal on Saturday. On Monday it killed someone.
.....I defended a case a few years back...... .
I was speaking wholistically to the notion that a better armed general public would result in a reduction in crime and specifically to the curtailing of thse lunatics showing up in schools or malls and what not, not to any particular measure or bill on a particular place or circumstance. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
A constitutionally protected right is not a privilege that the government giveth and the government can restrict or take away at its pleasure. The whole freaking point of having a constitution is to establish limits on the powers of government.
I love it when people just crap all over the plain language of the 2nd Amendment and act as if it provides a complete prohibition of any regulation on the ownership and possession of arms.A constitutionally protected right is not a privilege that the government giveth and the government can restrict or take away at its pleasure. The whole freaking point of having a constitution is to establish limits on the powers of government.
I love it when people just crap all over the plain language of the 2nd Amendment and act as if it provides a complete prohibition on any regulation on the ownership and possession of arms.