Vercingetorix
Fluidmaster
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 31,177
- Likes
- 2,727
The ball definetely moved and wiggled around when right as he was taking his second step. Not sure what reply you were looking at though.
Either way - was it something that should have been overturned? No. Way too close of a call. I'd expect them to not give him the TD as well if they had called it complete.
But seriously - you're blind if you didn't see it wiggle. It doesn't matter if he's switching hands... he hadn't got the second foot all the way down when he did try to and it wiggled.
uh, the point is to win the superbowl. going undefeated in the regular season and not winning the SB would be pointless.:thumbsup:I'm so glad the Patriots won. I'd hate to see them lose to a scrub team now and then go 18-1 and win the super bowl. That would be pointless.
They would have scored anyway. I hope when the Pats win the Super Bowl their coach and fans go on a door to door nationwide obnoxios celebration tour and the first house they stop at is Vercin's.
you know, they've called similar holding calls on defenses in 3 different games over the weekend. i know there was one in the Steelers/Bengals game, and even as a Steeler fan, i thought the call against the Bengals was ticky tack........i think it was complete. on the other hand they never should have called that BS holding penalty on 4th down.