Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,133
- Likes
- 62,612
I would have to look at their entire schedule to see who they have won against but it was only their second loss so evidently they have some quality wins as well.
I think we had slipped to 17 and back up to 15. I saw our sos is now 5 and rpi in the 30's even though they don't use that anymore..
NET Ranking 2021 Womens College Basketball | WarrenNolan.com
Just looked at Michigan's schedule and hard for me to see why they are ranked ahead of us in the Net even with just two losses. No one they have played scares anyone think they have a couple wins over top 20 teams also couple of losses. They have 0 top 10 wins and have won several games against the bottom feeders of the Big Ten.
We did jump from 20 to 15 in Massey Ratings: Massey Ratings - University of Tennessee Volunteers
I'm not sure what our RPI was before but it's up to 13 now: RealTimeRPI.com Tennessee Volunteers Women's College Basketball Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Ratings - A leading sports ratings and resources community on the Internet
I can't argue because everyone ranked ahead of us has fewer losses except Oregon who has played a tough schedule don't think it is much tougher than ours yet they are way up there. I don't know if a Georgia win will move us much higher I know a loss could move us lower. All the teams ahead of us would have to lose to someone bad for us to move up from where we are.
I'm not either most of the teams ranked ahead of us in the Net have records and wins over teams comparable to ours. Michigan is one that does not and there are a couple of others. Why we didn't move past them is something only the person in charge of the Net could explain.I’m not talking about the Coaches Poll or Associated i’m talking about the net ranking thing
Michigan lost and didn’t move because it hasn’t played games it rewards those for missing games. Look at Rutgers... they have 8 make up games or something
Now do i think their seeding will
be higher nope not at all no chance unless we have a complete collapse. But my point was i don’t understand how it works if it’s supposed to reward wins against top competition
I guess i just don’t get it which isn’t all that strange lol
i’m not arguing by the way just confused lol seemed like the game was a wash from the NET ranking standpoint
I’m not talking about the Coaches Poll or Associated i’m talking about the net ranking thing
Michigan lost and didn’t move because it hasn’t played games it rewards those for missing games. Look at Rutgers... they have 8 make up games or something
Now do i think their seeding will
be higher nope not at all no chance unless we have a complete collapse. But my point was i don’t understand how it works if it’s supposed to reward wins against top competition
I guess i just don’t get it which isn’t all that strange lol
i’m not arguing by the way just confused lol seemed like the game was a wash from the NET ranking standpoint
Look again, Indiana has not beaten several top 20 teams, the only ranked teams they have beaten are Northwestern (24), and Michigan.I really don't understand the net understood sos and rpi better. I know we have beaten a lot of top teams that have beaten a lot of top teams which is the way it used to work. We have a win over Indiana that has beaten several top 20 teams. Arkansas who has a top ten win, SC which has several top 20 wins, and Kentucky who has a few top 20 wins. So it does not make sense to me.
Yes I thought they had won that Maryland game but they lost by four. I really don't understand the Net Rankings it is new and seems a little odd. I knew more about sos and rpi but will eventually find out about Net. Right now I see no basis for some of the Big Ten schools high rankings in the Net.Look again, Indiana has not beaten several top 20 teams, the only ranked teams they have beaten are Northwestern (24), and Michigan.
Do you have any suggestions for numbers to play in the lottery, because except for the score you were right to predict an upset. It is a good chance that many did not predicted this. I liked the spirit the ladies showed in the second half. They did not let the fact that they were down by double digits stop them from hanging tough. I am so proud of this team. They are showing the guts that seamed to have gotten lost during the last 8 years. Go Lady Vols!!!!I think the LadyVols pull the upset and win 78-76.
She did much better against KK than Key scoring baskets. She is a superb rebounder but the work that KK and Key as a duo caused fatigue in the last five minutes of the game. They worked her really hard still had 17 and 16. Cooke was only 6 of 22 when you can stop a key player like that or if they are having a bad game always great chance to win.Another positive was our defense on Boston. She had a great night because she’s a great player, she worked for it though.
Almost all of her field goals came off offensive rebounds when we were out of system. She had a very tough time finding shots against our halfcourt D. Forced her to catch at the high post and she made one jumper and one good move against Kasi but that was all. If not for the bogus calls toward the end that put her at the line she would have been under her average.
She is an incredible rebounder. If the ball is near her she’s going to snatch it. Reminds me of Courtney Paris in that way. If the ball was within arms reach of Paris you just knew she was going to end up with it somehow. Boston has that same skill. Fun player to watch, I think she’ll have a great pro career after college.
She did much better against KK than Key scoring baskets. She is a superb rebounder but the work that KK and Key as a duo caused fatigue in the last five minutes of the game. They worked her really hard still had 17 and 16. Cooke was only 6 of 22 when you can stop a key player like that or if they are having a bad game always great chance to win.