Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,679
- Likes
- 64,695
Turning it over time after time trying to throw into a triple team to Russell standing still. What kind of play is that and why have we turned it over 10 times a game this season trying to make that play.
Russell is not a mobile player she is not Candace Parker. She stands in one place and it is easy to deflect a pass to her. What they do gives us a lot of easy 10 to 12 footers if we could hit a decent percentage of those then much better to get a shot every possession than turn it over 10 times on the very same pass.I wish I knew how many points Arky scored off this kind of turnover. Holly and a lot of commentators think that most LV offensive plays should go through Russell because of her almost 70% scoring percentage. All LV opponents are aware of this and they are going to double or triple team Russell. I believe that Holly should let Russell concentrate on drive defense and rebounds. I think her best scoring threats are Davis and Nared. If Holly could light a fire under Davis, she could be unstoppable.
Team has certainly changed in the last 15 games. We were a very aggressive defensive team in almost every game we played early. Tonight you could see in the very first quarter some of the players didn't want to give much effort and they didn't.
Also, the player's responsibility to respond to the coaching.
I agree with your statement. My only question is: Does the Miss St players respond more to their coach than the LV players to their coach?[
I think the players do respond to Holly. During the 4th quarter Holly called a timeout after Arkansas scored on a Hayes turnover. Instead of Holly, showing some discontent, she was giving the players high 5s. I am not saying she should be in a rage, but giving players high 5s after a screwups, especially in a close game, does not show that there are consequences for foolish turnovers. I really believe that Holly is way too soft. I believe that a good coach has to show emotions which allows their players to feel when they are upset with mistakes. Look at all the great coaches, I cant name one that high 5 players after mistakes.
Six years under Holly and we are still making way too many turnovers. Now we have an issue with defense in the key. If players are simply ignoring Holly, then Holly is not the best coach for this program. We have to eventually lay the problems at the feet of the coach and quit blaming the players we recruit.
If Davis and Jackson don't combine for over 50 points we lose to Arkansas. Arkansas hasn't come close to 85 points this season. The most they had scored in the SEC was 76 versus Alabama. Miss St beat them by 42. Missouri beat them by 34.South Carolina beat them by 48.
How terrible we won on the road! The box score is interesting. The LVs dominated the rebounding column and had just about half as many TOs as ARk (10 to 19) and a great assist total.
While the assist total was good, you have the TO stat backward. The Lady Vols had 19 TOs to Arkansas' 10.
Once again, against an, at best, mediocre Arkansas team the Lady Vols displayed a distressing lack of understanding of fundamental basketball. In my opinion, Holly is much too accepting of lackadaisical play on the part of the Lady Vols. While there is an abundance of talent on this team, and everyone should want the young ladies to have fun during their play, an emphasis on good fundamental basketball would serve this team well, in my opinion. One of the basics in basketball is that winning is fun! And, a return to basics would aid that endeavor! Again, just my opinion.
Jim
Yeah, you'd think our great minded coach would have that corrected by now.
How terrible we won on the road! The box score is interesting. The LVs dominated the rebounding column and had just about half as many TOs as ARk (10 to 19) and a great assist total.
While the assist total was good, you have the TO stat backward. The Lady Vols had 19 TOs to Arkansas' 10.
Once again, against an, at best, mediocre Arkansas team the Lady Vols displayed a distressing lack of understanding of fundamental basketball. In my opinion, Holly is much too accepting of lackadaisical play on the part of the Lady Vols. While there is an abundance of talent on this team, and everyone should want the young ladies to have fun during their play, an emphasis on good fundamental basketball would serve this team well, in my opinion. One of the basics in basketball is that winning is fun! And, a return to basics would aid that endeavor! Again, just my opinion.
Jim
I stand corrected. I misread the boxscore. TOs remain a problem.
If you had made this comment after the LSU game, I would have agreed 100% (so the LVs do have those troublesome tendencies). In the game, they looked like a team that wanted to play harder (and did fight pretty hard under the boards) but did not have the "legs."
I am starting to worry that the LVs missed the mark on preseason conditioning. At the start of the season, much was made that Holly decided to let the team play itself into shape because of the short bench. On one hand, that approach makes sense; over working a team with a short bench can create injury problems but it is a fine line to walk. Right now, the LVs seem to be wearing down in this tough stretch of the season.
Hopefull, they can find some source of rejuvenation-- the change to the tournament might be one spark but they need to get more energetic or they will drop games in the SEC.