ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 20,565
- Likes
- 40,871
The re-purposing of the word is part of an effort, IMO, on their part to refuse to be beholden to what the word means.
Do you not see a difference between a man, especially if he has ill intent, calling a woman a "bitch" and a group of a woman's friends calling her a "bitch" in an endearing way? Because the N-word is the exact same way. Words, any word, can have different meanings based on context.
That's correct, words do have meanings depending on context. But I would say the same to the women. It is better to control ones own reaction to people with ill intent than it is to react- or overreact- and cede one's own emotional control to someone that seemingly doesn't have one's well-being or interest in mind.
It seems like you're missing the point- I'm not arguing that the word causes people issues, I'm arguing that there's a certain irony to claiming a word is oppressive while the people it's oppressing are precisely the ones submitting themselves to the oppression by reacting so strongly. If a person truly is free and has control and lives as a strong individual, the words of an idiot shouldn't drive them into a rage. If the world learned to ignore the trolls rather than feed them, we'd all be better off. Instead, we are confronted by weakness and fragility and hate.
I think I also have the right to call out a person saying anyone else flat cannot say what they want. That's not saying there shouldn't be consequences to saying certain things; in this case, it's resisting the claim of a certifiable lunatic to some skin-tone-based power to dictate what is and isn't allowable speech.