The lead sentence in this article is highly misleading and is putting words and meaning into Gino's mouth. He never said he didn't see what the big deal was about Tenn. basketball anymore. This is a writer trying to stir up sh!t. What he said was he didn't understand what the big to do was about Uconn playing Tenn again. That is a big difference.
The first statement- which he never really said, implies an insult to the Vol. basketball program. That would imply that Tenn Vol basketball was history - they are not a big deal anymore etc. He was only referring to the Rivalry that used to exist between Uconn and Tenn. Most of that was because of the bad blood between Pat and him. Pat is no longer with us and it appeared that any animosity that existed had run it's course before she passed. If Pat were still alive the rivalry would certainly mean a lot more. The rivalry was as much about Pat and Gino as it was about Uconn and Tenn, their programs only being extensions of themselves.
How I read his statement is that he believes that people are trying to recreate a situation and circumstance that no longer exists. Neither Uconn nor Tenn are the dominant programs they were back when the rivalry existed. It has been three years since Uconn won a Natty and they are not favored next year rather just one of many who have a shot next year. For the last few years, the rivalry was between ND and Uconn and even that one will mean far less because ND and Uconn are both expected to have down years.
Put into the proper context his statement of " with all the teams we play and who we have played the last x number of years, it just doesn't seem the same. It is almost like they are any other school now. That statement has to be put into context. In context, it is not insulting to the Tenn vol program. He never said Tenn Vol basketball was not a big deal anymore. He said the rivalry was not a big deal anymore. Big difference.
This makes sense. There are just too many other good programs that will compete for the top position. Next year, for instance, the conscientious pick will be Oregon, with Baylor and Stanford and a lot of other programs right on their heels. Next year is the first year in memory with Uconn not considered as one of the favorites.
News people are just horrible in today's reality. The make a point of distorting context to create controversy. There was nothing negative or controversial about Gino's statement except via the spin that this writer put on it.