******* golden!!!

#151
#151
jp1 said:
AKA...."I can't come up with a good rebuttal"
Click to expand...

Not at all. He bolded two parts of a previous post of mine and said I was a walking contradiction... to which he failed to elaborate his point... which mind you, made no sense. He just made a wild and random accusation and frankly I couldn't even begin to respond to it because again, it made no sense. But what did make sense and was very obvious by his desire to name call is.... he mad bro....
 
#152
#152
TG is making the best of the situation he is dealt. The guy is playing out of position, and still doing a damn fine job if you ask me. Where would this team be without him? Nowhere near the team they are now for sure.
 
#154
#154
UT's#1Fan said:
No. The only thing you pointed out is that youre mad and must resort to name calling when you've successfully lost an argument. Pretty lame IMO.
Click to expand...

Only thing I see as lame is delusional attention seeking posters claiming an internet victory when it is painfully obvious you contradicted your entire point that you developed throughout this thread.

Kinda sad when a person can't man up when they are wrong. Of course, you have to be a man first of all to pull that off.
 
#155
#155
UT's#1Fan said:
Not at all. He bolded two parts of a previous post of mine and said I was a walking contradiction... to which he failed to elaborate his point... which mind you, made no sense. He just made a wild and random accusation and frankly I couldn't even begin to respond to it because again, it made no sense. But what did make sense and was very obvious by his desire to name call is.... he mad bro....
Click to expand...

If it made no sense then my idiot comment stands true. The bolded portions were the proof that you are a walking contradiction. No reason to elaborate when a light has already been shined in the area of contention. It's not that I'm mad bro, it's just that you are dim, nothing more.
 
#156
#156
sanddune50 said:
If it made no sense then my idiot comment stands true. The bolded portions were the proof that you are a walking contradiction. No reason to elaborate when a light has already been shined in the area of contention. It's not that I'm mad bro, it's just that you are dim, nothing more.
Click to expand...

You bolded hopson2.0 and where I said Golden had heart and was able to look past his previous minutes poor performance and move on... how is that a contradiction?

Since you’re mentally unable to elaborate your point, because you don't know wtf your were trying to say to begin with, I’ll try to get inside your brain and understand what delusional point you were trying to make...

I assume you're implying the Hopson was never able to look past his previous poor plays and more forward to the next play... which is true of Hopson BUT that's not the reason why I said Golden was Hopson2.0. I clearly said their similarity was the fact that they are both inconsistent. It's all there in the OP… Just because I said he's Hopson2.0 doesn’t mean they have to share ALL the same traits.

I guess by your logic I’m a pathological liar too because I said Golden was Hopson2.0 and clearly there is only (1) Scotty Hopson and therefore how can Golden be Hopson? Clearly Golden is Trae Golden and not Scotty Hopson. .. in that case, you’re right. My B.

this is why i didn't want to respond to your original "contradiction" comment, I’ve wasted 5 minutes of my life. But i guess it's not a complete waste... hopefully this response has humbled you a bit. Don't worry about it. It gets better.
 
#157
#157
UT's#1Fan said:
You bolded hopson2.0 and where I said Golden had heart and was able to look past his previous minutes poor performance and move on... how is that a contradiction?

Since you’re mentally unable to elaborate your point, because you don't know wtf your were trying to say to begin with, I’ll try to get inside your brain and understand what delusional point you were trying to make...

I assume you're implying the Hopson was never able to look past his previous poor plays and more forward to the next play... which is true of Hopson BUT that's not the reason why I said Golden was Hopson2.0. I clearly said their similarity was the fact that they are both inconsistent. It's all there in the OP… Just because I said he's Hopson2.0 doesn’t mean they have to share ALL the same traits.

I guess by your logic I’m a pathological liar too because I said Golden was Hopson2.0 and clearly there is only (1) Scotty Hopson and therefore how can Golden be Hopson? Clearly Golden is Trae Golden and not Scotty Hopson. .. in that case, you’re right. My B.

this is why i didn't want to respond to your original "contradiction" comment, I’ve wasted 5 minutes of my life. But i guess it's not a complete waste... hopefully this response has humbled you a bit. Don't worry about it. It gets better.
Click to expand...

Sandune? R u okay?
 
#159
#159
Will people quit their *****ing about Golden now? This team is 10x better with him on the floor than without him. He got two fouls, Vols went down, came back in, went up, and then now it's only a 1 point game. If you cannot see how good Golden is, you either need to get glasses or check into an insane asylum, because there is obviously something wrong with you.
 
#162
#162
Our offense was NOTHING without Golden and this game showed that. He did an amazing job at leading them today!!
 
#165
#165
I wish all these bumps would stop. It just starts the same bs up again. We all know when someone makes a stupid comment and don't really need to be reminded.

Why can't we all just get along after kicking vandys ass.
 
#166
#166
Spartacavolus said:
I wish all these bumps would stop. It just starts the same bs up again. We all know when someone makes a stupid comment and don't really need to be reminded.

Why can't we all just get along after kicking vandys ass.
Click to expand...

Agree. We need to wait on non gamedays.

The we can bump. :)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top