volbound1700
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
- Messages
- 8,681
- Likes
- 12,096
Yep...just the way matchups lined up...and arguably UT and TaM...maybe Ark were the only teams really peaking. For some reason, other teams peaking at right time...Miami, Mich, etc. Vols win vs Mich if we don't go on scoring drought. If's and buts, but our seedings didn't pan out for us, and 3 of 4 top tier teams (UT, UK, Aub) didn't show up.A) No it's not.
B) This is a football conference first. This ain't the ACC, and the SEC dominates football.
C) The SEC pretty much already dominates in the other better known sports; women's basketball, baseball, softball.
The SEC is doing just fine.
I'm thinking Barnes and Pearl have a point that the SEC tourney may not be a plus for teams going into the NCAA unless your one that needs a bid. Barnes said he would agree the only teams that don't have a bid locked up should play in the tourney and Pearl said the season is already a grind and the SEC tourney just adds more grind. SEC tourney is just about money. Their opinions are worth thinking about.
Clear their game plan was to shut down Vescovi and they succeeded.Yep...just the way matchups lined up...and arguably UT and TaM...maybe Ark were the only teams really peaking. For some reason, other teams peaking at right time...Miami, Mich, etc. Vols win vs Mich if we don't go on scoring drought. If's and buts, but our seedings didn't pan out for us, and 3 of 4 top tier teams (UT, UK, Aub) didn't show up.
We just can't beat teams from the big 10. Maybe it's the way those teams are built to succeed in that conference? They approach it from inside out where we seem to be married to the 3 ball? Maybe their style of play is more suited to tournament ? Or maybe we're just cursed? We're the Minnesota Vikings of college sports? Frustrating as hell.Yep...just the way matchups lined up...and arguably UT and TaM...maybe Ark were the only teams really peaking. For some reason, other teams peaking at right time...Miami, Mich, etc. Vols win vs Mich if we don't go on scoring drought. If's and buts, but our seedings didn't pan out for us, and 3 of 4 top tier teams (UT, UK, Aub) didn't show up.
We’ve beat big ten teams before. Don’t fall into simplistic thinking. It’s about matchups, shooting %, luck and the way the game is reffed among other factorsWe just can't beat teams from the big 10. Maybe it's the way those teams are built to succeed in that conference? They approach it from inside out where we seem to be married to the 3 ball? Maybe their style of play is more suited to tournament ? Or maybe we're just cursed? We're the Minnesota Vikings of college sports? Frustrating as hell.
As a fan it's a nice distraction, and I'm glad we won it. But the truth is, it's kind of worthless and this year pretty much proved it unless our name was Kentucky. If it went away I'd get over it. But it never will.
I'm thinking Barnes and Pearl have a point that the SEC tourney may not be a plus for teams going into the NCAA unless your one that needs a bid. Barnes said he would agree the only teams that don't have a bid locked up should play in the tourney and Pearl said the season is already a grind and the SEC tourney just adds more grind. SEC tourney is just about money. Their opinions are worth thinking about.
I was thrilled to win the SEC Tournament and the players truly deserved that moment.
However, I wouldn’t be upset if they got rid of Conference Tournaments all together.
All teams should have a full week of preparation for the NCAA Tournament.
If you didn’t do well enough in the regular season to earn a spot in the Big Dance, that’s on you as a coach and a team.
I agree...you can tell they said shut down Santi...and at the end of the day, as well as Chandler played, he just couldn't do it all. JJJ did well in first half but don't remember him doing too much in second half (or anyone besides Chandler)Clear their game plan was to shut down Vescovi and they succeeded.