Greg Schiano

#51
#51
IluvdoubleD's said:
Just so you know, this guy that we "flexed on" was well known, and well liked, and had been recruited by half the kids we had on the squad at the time. If he winds up in the NFL he could have already. We really did damage his reputation and he took no action. He doesn't HAVE to be in college at this point.
Click to expand...
Schiano?
 
#52
#52
Did you guys know JG was a schi guy? Tennessee basically stole him from schi, and then treated both as such . Still wondering why?
 
#57
#57
IluvdoubleD's said:
Just so you know, this guy that we "flexed on" was well known, and well liked, and had been recruited by half the kids we had on the squad at the time. If he winds up in the NFL he could have already. We really did damage his reputation and he took no action. He doesn't HAVE to be in college at this point.
Click to expand...

Could someone run that through Google Translate for me? I don't speak Schinaoworshiper

IluvdoubleD's said:
That guy could have sued the **** out of us if he wanted to.
Click to expand...

Sure he could. Anyone can sue anyone. Would he have prevailed? Did he REALLY want the sworn statement regarding his knowledge to be explored?

He didn't sue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matt1107, LoudOrange, GetYouSomeofThat and 2 others
#58
#58
He was deemed innocent in the court of law. There was ZERO evidence in one of the biggest FEDERAL investigations of college ball in history. Tennessee just didn't believe it, and was in a mood to throw another fit. He probably would have won. He understood why we did it.
 
#59
#59
Point is, it was a marraige doomed for divorce and he realized it too, so he took no action, and you should drop it.
 
#61
#61
IluvdoubleD's said:
He was deemed innocent in the court of law. There was ZERO evidence in one of the biggest FEDERAL investigations of college ball in history. Tennessee just didn't believe it, and was in a mood to throw another fit. He probably would have won. He understood why we did it.
Click to expand...
When was he tried? He would have lost bad! And a lot more details would have been aired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GetYouSomeofThat
#62
#62
IluvdoubleD's said:
He was deemed innocent in the court of law. There was ZERO evidence in one of the biggest FEDERAL investigations of college ball in history. Tennessee just didn't believe it, and was in a mood to throw another fit. He probably would have won. He understood why we did it.
Click to expand...
I missed that trial. Tell us about it. I know he was accused of knowing by McQueary. Doesn’t mean it’s true but did Schiano ever sue McQueary?
 
  • Like
Reactions: matt1107, midnight orange, GetYouSomeofThat and 1 other person
#64
#64
IluvdoubleD's said:
He was deemed innocent in the court of law. There was ZERO evidence in one of the biggest FEDERAL investigations of college ball in history. Tennessee just didn't believe it, and was in a mood to throw another fit. He probably would have won. He understood why we did it.
Click to expand...

Try again. Sworn deposition testimony is evidence. Is it true? Is it enough? Is it credible? Those are fair questions. But it IS evidence, and sworn at that.

Mike McQueary's deposition: Greg Schiano witnessed Jerry Sandusky's abuse (saturdaytradition.com)
 
  • Like
Reactions: midnight orange and VolNExile
#66
#66
IluvdoubleD's said:
That guy could have sued the **** out of us if he wanted to.
Click to expand...

"Anybody can serve sue papers on anybody for anything they want", the old country lawyer told us on the jury he was speaking to that day. He paused and added "however proving your case in court to prevail is the secret." That old country lawyer was correct and our jury saw it his way thst day, I've never forgotten it. Schiano would never have prevailed in a Knox County Court and he saved himself $s in attorneys fees in a losing effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile
#67
#67
IluvdoubleD's said:
Point is, it was a marraige doomed for divorce and he realized it too, so he took no action, and you should drop it.
Click to expand...

Honest question, my Vol brother: why do you feel the need to defend him so vigorously? Heck, I have no idea what was true and what wasn't with respect to Schiano, but I have never lost a moment of sleep over any perceived injustice to him. I don't get your dedication to his cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile
#69
#69
#71
#71
butchna said:
Not in civil court.
Click to expand...

It's not allowed in civil court, either. It has to fall under one of the exceptions, and there's no way that "Gud Bradley told me that Schiano told Bradley that Schiano saw Sandusky..." falls under any of the exceptions.
 
#72
#72
bamawriter said:
It's not allowed in civil court, either. It has to fall under one of the exceptions, and there's no way that "Gud Bradley told me that Schiano told Bradley that Schiano saw Sandusky..." falls under any of the exceptions.
Click to expand...
Didn’t follow the OJ civil trial? Allowed a lot of hearsay. You simplified McQueary’s account, I’m sure it would’ve been allowed. This is all beside the point. IF Schiano sued the university because of damage to his reputation? He would have to introduce all this other crap, himself. Fans didn’t invent the allegations…they REACTED.
 
#73
#73
butchna said:
Didn’t follow the OJ civil trial? Allowed a lot of hearsay. You simplified McQueary’s account, I’m sure it would’ve been allowed. This is all beside the point. IF Schiano sued the university because of damage to his reputation? He would have to introduce all this other crap, himself. Fans didn’t invent the allegations…they REACTED.
Click to expand...

Didn't follow it super well because I was in 8th grade, but I've read quite a bit. I don't recall anything that wouldn't have fallen under one of the exceptions, but perhaps you have something in mind.

And yes, I simplified McQueary's account, but it would in no way be admissable even in a trial where Schiano was a party. McQueary never claimed to have heard it directly from Schiano, and Gus Bradley has steadfastly denied ever telling McQueary any such thing.

That said, the entire idea of Schiano suing is absurd. Who would he have sued? Random fans on the internet? No one at UT ever said anything remotely defamatory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolInNW
#74
#74
bamawriter said:
Didn't follow it super well because I was in 8th grade, but I've read quite a bit. I don't recall anything that wouldn't have fallen under one of the exceptions, but perhaps you have something in mind.

And yes, I simplified McQueary's account, but it would in no way be admissable even in a trial where Schiano was a party. McQueary never claimed to have heard it directly from Schiano, and Gus Bradley has steadfastly denied ever telling McQueary any such thing.

That said, the entire idea of Schiano suing is absurd. Who would he have sued? Random fans on the internet? No one at UT ever said anything remotely defamatory.
Click to expand...
We’re not too far in disagreement.
 
#75
#75
IluvdoubleD's said:
Just so you know, this guy that we "flexed on" was well known, and well liked, and had been recruited by half the kids we had on the squad at the time. If he winds up in the NFL he could have already. We really did damage his reputation and he took no action. He doesn't HAVE to be in college at this point.
Click to expand...
Schiano was recruited by our players?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top