This is the best I could muster:
"His children are not interested in carrying on farming. In fact, they have left the country."
marxist leninist takeover of africa
Out of Africa
The Marxist pretenders wanted complete power, immediately.
The whites opposed this irresponsible demand. It should be
said that once the communists started financing wars, the
whites began a process of inclusion, and of finding the
most suitable black people to hand over to. This happened
in both Zimbabwe and South Africa. In both cases, there
were suitable anti-Communists whom we wanted to hand power
over to. These were people we believed could rule the country
successfully. Bishop Muzorewa won a free and fair election
and became the first black ruler of Zimbabwe/Rhodesia (as it
was called for a time). But the Marxists did not like this
and continued a war against him until they won. Similarly,
in South Africa, Chief Buthelezi of the Zulus seemed to be
the most promising pro-Western man. But the ANC was quick
to attack him and fight bitterly against him so that he
could never gain the support of the majority of blacks.
It is worth noting the attitude of the blacks themselves,
the masses in whose name all this was being done. The race
relations between blacks and whites in the colonial days
were far better than now. It is true there was racism and
true that there was a certain amount of unhappiness, but
it was nothing like the problems of today.
There is a popular mythology which has been spread
around the world by communist propagandists which creates
the impression that black people were so frustrated that
they were ready to ?storm the Bastille? in order to remove
themselves from the yoke of colonialism. This is not true,
especially among the older blacks. The communists got most
of their support from the impressionable youth. But, the
darkest secret of all is that in order to win the blacks
to their side, the Marxist Liberators had to use extreme
forms of violence. Terror was the tactic. The terror was
gruesome and hideous.
We whites were outraged by the use of Marxist terror,
and we saw these Marxist pretenders as being nothing more
than terrorists who would stoop to any level -- to murder,
torture or lying in order to come to power. Often, people
in the rest of the world were amazed at why, a mere 250,000
whites in Rhodesia held out so bitterly against the likes
of Mugabe and Nkomo. But that was because we believed them
to be the embodiment of evil. If they were the voice of the
people, then why did the people not flock to them? If they
were the saviors of the black masses, then why did they have
to beat and murder black people and terrorize them into
subjugation in order to win their support?
If the black people were so keen to get rid of white
rule then why did six million blacks not swamp 250,000
whites and murder us all? They outnumbered us twenty to
one. They could have killed us with spears and pangas if
they hated us so much. But they didn't.
Why?
The truth is, many blacks were not too keen on the
Liberators. So the Liberators had to conduct an 'ethnic
cleansing,' or to be more accurate, a purging of the
blacks. Anyone who opposed their Marxist-Leninist
nonsense had to dealt with. Any black man who was
friendly to whites or a supporter of the whites had to
be murdered or intimidated. Black policemen and black
soldiers and their families were attacked. What is hardly
ever mentioned is that in both Rhodesia and South Africa,
one found thousands of black men who were either Policemen
or who fought in our armies. Right to the end, there were
blacks fighting to keep the whites in power. There were
blacks who were not impressed with the Marxist pretenders
or their methods.
Some of the finest troops in the Rhodesian and South
African armies were blacks who were opposed to communism.
The deadly Selous Scouts for example, were composed mostly
of blacks in a counter terrorist role. In South Africa,
32 battalion consisted of blacks and Portuguese who were
opposed to Marxists.
(..........read on...........)
Out of Africa
excerpts:
It is worth giving an example of their approach. In
Zimbabwe, the war was fought in the rural areas, often
far away from civilization. A gang of guerrillas would
approach a village and gather together all the people
who maybe numbered several hundred. They would try to
convince the villagers to support them. They would even
teach them politically orientated songs. They would
indoctrinate them with Marxist ideology. But then they
would warn them of what would happen to a "sellout."
They would then pick a man from the audience, to
demonstrate to the villagers what they would do to
someone who cooperated with the whites. They might
pick a man and then start beating him while forcing
the villagers to watch. On some occasions they would
begin cutting off flesh from his living body. A favorite
target was to cut a man?s ears off, or cut his lips off.
They might cut his lips off with a knife or a bayonet or
even rip them off with pliers. Then they would call his
wife and ask her to cook her husband?s flesh. Then they
would make her eat it.
All this would be done in full view of the horrified
villagers. For all to see, by way of an object lesson,
they would beat an innocent man, torture him and finally
bayonet him to death. This, they would declare, is what
will happen to anyone who cooperates with the whites.
In South Africa a similar tactic was practiced in order
to terrify all the blacks into submission. Winnie Mandela's
infamous statement about freeing South Africa with boxes
of matches is all about killing blacks who opposed the ANC
and who worked with the whites. The ANC wanted a method of
killing people, which would terrorize all black opposition
into submission. So they invented the infamous 'necklace.'
They dreamed up the idea of putting a tire around a person's
neck (i.e., a necklace) and filling it with petrol, which
would be set alight. The person would thus burn to death.
But, it was not as simple as that. The person would often
be beaten, stoned, set alight and maybe, in the end stabbed
to ensure that they were dead. This is the dreadful terror
which Winnie Mandela and the rest of the ANC are so proud
of. For all the errors of the whites, such methods of terror
were not used by whites against blacks in any of the colonies.
One should therefore call into question the right of
communists to claim that they are the voice of black
Africans. In my opinion they are not. They no longer
cut people?s body parts off, nor do they set them alight,
but they still use force when it?s needed. They are not
averse to murdering blacks who oppose them. The ANC has
not ruled South Africa long enough for us to see them
using state force to cower the black masses, but that
day may yet come. In Zimbabwe, in 2000, Mugabe sent thugs
into villages to beat up those who supported his democratic
opposition. Others were sent to ?re-education camps? (a
nice old Soviet-era phrase!) In the 1980?s the Matabele
tribe in southern Zimbabwe expressed its dissatisfaction
with Mugabe. He responded by engaging in genocide. He
sent the North Korean-trained 5th Brigade in to beat,
torture and murder black people. He killed approximately
2,000 people. Entire villages were wiped out and people
were thrown down wells. Not a peep was heard out of the
rest of the world.
Imagine if the whites had done such a thing? The world
would have declared war on us and bombed us into submission.
But, a black communist can do it and hardly anyone takes
notice. Such are the double standards the world applies to
us in Africa. The white man is measured by one yardstick
and the black Marxist by another.
Whites never committed such heinous crimes, but the black
communists could cut people up, kick babies around like
footballs until they die, hamstring men before killing
them or rape and kill women -- and nobody says a thing.
This is the big, deep, dark secret of the rulers of
southern Africa today. The same people who wear suits
and drink champagne, and are lauded across the world,
are the same men who once ordered their followers to put
Portuguese people on sawmills or who planted landmines to
blow up white and black civilians alike. Life to them was
cheap then and it remains so now.
They kill black people even more readily than they kill
whites. But they preach human rights and refuse to hang
murderers. They cannot tell right from wrong, nor are
they interested in it. They rose to power by terrorizing
innocent people. Now that they are in power they protect
drug dealers and criminals.
We whites may have committed crimes, we may have done many
wrongs (including keeping black people down) but our crimes
are far less than theirs. We have also, in the final analysis
learned from our mistakes and most of us regret that we did
not change our ways more willingly or earlier. But the
communists who are in power see no wrong in anything they
did. They are bereft of conscience. This is part of the
training they got from the Russians and others. Everything
they do in the pursuit of power is correct. They never do
wrong. These moral degenerates now run countries like
multimillionaires and smile in front of cameras.
But their
hands are covered in the blood of the black people they
murdered to get there.