cjbongoinstructor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,006
- Likes
- 365
Credit is like a lot of other things. There's a time and a place for it and only meant for the responsible. Should not be illegal though. However, deadbeat borrowers and Wall Street scammers be damned.
Well, it sounds like it's a phantom issue. According to the article, the company's debt is because the owners (i.e. the Haslams) paid themselves 1.7 billion from it. Either way, it's probably more something Browns fans should worry about than UT fans. I think the elder Haslams are more the ones who give money to the school regularly and I doubt they are in any kind of debt.
We obviously cannot handle that responsibility as a society. There are too any lives that have been ruined.
I see your point...but we've proven we can't handle food as a society either. Should that be regulated?
At some point, you have to let the irresponsible (you know, morons) suffer the consequences. . Not allowing that is one thing I think is hurting us.
the Haslams- despite one's holier-than-thou sophomoric delusions of altruism- are extremely important to our university and the broader community, and we should support them and Pilot in any (reasonable) way that we can
Hiding all that money from the feds to avoid taxes and now lawsuit after lawsuit will do that. Also, taking out loans for expansion will also do that. A company can be in debt up to its eyeballs and still be profitable -- hell, most big corps. operate on debt these days. It's just the way business is done today. It also wouldn't surprise me to learn that the Haslam family drained the profit and operates Pilot on debt -- also common practice for large 'family' businesses and since a corp can just file for bankruptcy there's every financial incentive to do it despite it being a shady practice. (Not defending Pilot or Jimmy but that IS the way it works).
That said, UT benefits from Haslam family money not corporate money.