bpalmer28
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,206
- Likes
- 19,889
I think tempo....wider splits from the WRs...and the desire to push the ball down the field in passing are the 3 biggest differences between this and anything else we have seen at UT.
There is nothing unique in the calls or designs versus what you can see most teams running around the game nowadays though.
Maybe so, but I'm seeing a lot of WR behind the secondary. If we can find a way to get the ball to them, this offense can work. Of course, it remains to be seen how it will fare vs the SEC gauntlet.The plays I’m seeing are not innovative or creative, just a bunch of RPO hand offs, screens, and the occasional deep shot. The only thing that’s different is the tempo. Heupel’s philosophy is to run as many plays as possible to creative as many scoring opportunities as possible. But the plays themselves are nothing special. Thoughts?
There were a lot of UCF fans who were not sorry to see him go. Same complaints. Far to much emphasis on the deep ball. Just like Gus, it won't be long before SEC D coordinators peg our offense. At that point, the talent deficiency, especially at QB, will make the offense look even worse.I agree. When he was hired, I thought our offense was going to be fun to watch. I’ve been disappointingly bored with our offense so far.
Is an innovative offense the same as innovative music?The plays I’m seeing are not innovative or creative, just a bunch of RPO hand offs, screens, and the occasional deep shot. The only thing that’s different is the tempo. Heupel’s philosophy is to run as many plays as possible to creative as many scoring opportunities as possible. But the plays themselves are nothing special. Thoughts?
Definitely, that’s the exact definition of his offense. But it has to be kept relatively simple for the players to be able to operate at such a quick pace from play-to-play.The plays I’m seeing are not innovative or creative, just a bunch of RPO hand offs, screens, and the occasional deep shot. The only thing that’s different is the tempo. Heupel’s philosophy is to run as many plays as possible to creative as many scoring opportunities as possible. But the plays themselves are nothing special. Thoughts?
If we aren’t running flea flickers and WR passes people think the play calling is bad. Sad.People here never cease to amaze me with their bad takes and complete lack of football knowledge. Huepel's offense is about pace of play and creating maximum space. His plays/schemes have created open look after open look and we are scoring in bunches. It may not seem "innovative" whatever the hell that means, but it's a modern offense that is embraced across football now. We fell desperately behind everyone trying to run Fulmerball the last three years and most of the players on the roster were recruited for that purpose.
First game announcers said they only run a handful of plays, they just run them a lot. Nothing special.The plays I’m seeing are not innovative or creative, just a bunch of RPO hand offs, screens, and the occasional deep shot. The only thing that’s different is the tempo. Heupel’s philosophy is to run as many plays as possible to creative as many scoring opportunities as possible. But the plays themselves are nothing special. Thoughts?