jamesd1628
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Messages
- 1,830
- Likes
- 238
It is both. You could end up in the same place x years out but the path to get there could be very different.
A simple example over 2 observations:
Case 1: 10, 0 equals an average of 5
Case 2: 5, 5 equals an average of 5
So, while the end result may be essentially the same, the impact of volatility can be disruptive more so than a smooth, steady path.
In any event, I'm not sure that volitility should necessarily be an argument for or against a tax plan, especially on a the federal government level. The easiest answer to volitility would be to budget only to the extent that volitility is not a factor. Given that the US runs significant deficits anyway, it's probably a non-factor.