Hillary Clinton doing what the Clintons do best.

#26
#26
Can't even read Wiki, huh?

The Nazis claimed that communism was dangerous to the well-being of nations because of its intention to dissolve private property, its support of class conflict, its aggression against the middle class, its hostility to small businessmen, and its atheism. Nazism rejected class conflict-based socialism and economic egalitarianism, favouring instead a stratified economy with classes based on merit and talent, retaining private property, and the creation of national solidarity that transcends class distinction.
Yeah... The Nazis were totally leftist.

Thanks for visiting another edition of "Fabricating History!" with gsvol!
 
#27
#27
Can't even read Wiki, huh?


Yeah... The Nazis were totally leftist.

Thanks for visiting another edition of "Fabricating History!" with gsvol!

Wiccanpedia, the end source for the naive
and airheaded.

wordfromlbruce.jpg


So you are saying our present administration in
Washington (and the democrat party) are more
like nazis than communists???

Gemeinnutzgeht vor Eigennutz. (The common
good supersedes the private good.) ~ Nazi slogan
Prologue Fanatical environmentalism, vegetarianism,
animal rights and public health are four progressive
policy initiatives that most people would not readily
associate with Hitler and the Nazis. "Unlike Marxism,
which declared much of culture and humanity irrelevant
to the revolution, National Socialism was holistic," ..
Indeed, "organic" and "holistic" were the Nazi terms
of art for totalitarianism.

American Thinker: The Nazi Origins of Apocalyptic Global Warming Theory

Schwab had been a strong nature lover since
boyhood, and by the 1920's he became very
active in the emerging environmental movement
in Austria. Later, he joined the Nazi Party.
While this may sound odd to many who
have bought into the Marxian propaganda
over the years that the Nazis were right
wing capitalistic extremists, greens who
signed up for the Nazi Party were actually
very typical of the day.
The most widely
represented group of people in the Nazi Party
was the greens, and Guenther Schwab was just
one of among many.
------------------------------

Long before Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth," green
Nazi Guenther Schwab played a large role in
catalyzing the frightening theory of global
warming. With no small thanks to Schwab, the
Great Tribulation of Global Warming was ushered
into the modern consciousness behind the collapse
of the Millennial 1,000 year Third Reich.

Your take on this is about like the media calling
the Iranian regime conservative because they
are theocratic.

Do you understand the concept of a mobious strip??

Take anything and use an abundance of double talk
and eventually up seems like down and down seems
like up.

What good was owning private property when the
government had so many regulations that they
effectively ran your business and told you what
you could manufacture or not??
 
#28
#28
Where do you get that???

It is an unequivocal truth that they weren't socially
conservative!!!








So they attacked their fellow leftists???

Then our only bone of contention was whether
they were fanatical or not??

The German people resented being rendered a slave
state as a settlement to WWI.

If you consider that socialism is a leftist ideal and
that conservatives strive to perpetuate free interprise
then both Hitler's nazis and Stalinists are both left
wing enterprises.








DUH!!!!!

They were fanatical leftists.





OK then, how do you classify the nazis??

I just wrote a rather lengthy post about it. Would you rather I post cartoons so you can understand it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#29
#29
Did I miss something? The quote says that she refused to endorse the UK. So, she doesn't want to be in the middle of it. What, exactly, is wrong with that?
 
#31
#31
She did something while existing as Hitlery.

Now that I've read the whole article, she's trying to be a mediator between two allies. My question still stands. Also, who cares? It's not our business. It's between Argentina and the UK. Just because we helped Britain in a military engagement during a Republican President's reign doesn't mean we need to back them again and again.

And gsvol only does the "Hitlery" thing because he can't come up with anything that rhymes with Hillary and makes sense.
 
#34
#34
I recently used one of those toilets that has separate flush options for liquid or solid waste.

Heil Hitler!
 
#37
#37
I just wrote a rather lengthy post about it. Would you rather I post cartoons so you can understand it?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

You posted a buch of gibberish that proves you don't know what you're talking about, as per usual.

First you try to claim the nazis were some sort of conservative right wing group and then you say the nazis attacked their fellow leftists.

A while back you tried to claim that obama wasn't involved in the internal politics of Kenya but eventually gave all that up except the claim that obama's candidate had an agreement to enact sharia law.

Begs the question, why did hitlery spend $50 million of state department money (our tax dollars) to promote a successful attempt to amend the Kenyan constitution to include sharia courts in Kenya, helping the islamo/fascists advance their political agenda??





Did I miss something? The quote says that she refused to endorse the UK. So, she doesn't want to be in the middle of it. What, exactly, is wrong with that?

The UK has had dominion over those islands for nearly 200 years, the inhabitants are almost exclusively British subjects.

Argentina has no ligitimate claim.

There is nothing to negotiate.





She did something while existing as Hitlery.

World's smartest woman.

r4238509687.jpg


capt.54a6c1f1bd834d7e935c66880185cf84-54a6c1f1bd834d7e935c66880185cf84-0.jpg


lipstickpig01.jpg
 
#38
#38
Umm... I didn't claim the Nazis were conservative and right wing. Good call on that one. Perhaps you should loosen up the aluminum foil helmet to allow for proper blood flow to the brain
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#39
#39
Still don't know why you think we should be taking sides and why it's wrong that we aren't.
 
#40
#40
Still don't know why you think we should be taking sides and why it's wrong that we aren't.

It's not that you should take a side, it's that you should take the side of those who contribute to AtlasShrugged or whichever nutjob blog he copied and pasted his feelings from on this particular issue.
 
#41
#41
Now that I've read the whole article, she's trying to be a mediator between two allies. My question still stands. Also, who cares? It's not our business. It's between Argentina and the UK. Just because we helped Britain in a military engagement during a Republican President's reign doesn't mean we need to back them again and again.

And gsvol only does the "Hitlery" thing because he can't come up with anything that rhymes with Hillary and makes sense.

That just happens to be my point, what business does Hillary have sticking her nose into it???

And get your facts straight, we didn't help Britian militarily against Argentina!

Picture story of Hillary mediating:

hillary-drinking-beer-in-indiana.jpg


s-HILLARY-DRINKING-large.jpg


hillary%2Bdrinking.jpg


political-pictures-hillary-clinton-scotch.jpg


hillary-clinton-looking-tired.jpg










No, it works. Environmentalists are automatically Nazis. Duh.

Oh, gotcha. I guess he was right in calling me a Nazi.

No one said that all environmentalists are nazis, what was said is that the nazis were the first radical environmentalists, nowadays radical environmentalism is pretty much a plank in the socialist agenda, no matter the variety of socialist.

No one called you a nazi either and you know it.

The way you, volatile and a few others talk though, it does remind of one of a Hitler speechs:

Adolph Hitler in a May Day speech 1933: "When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side,' I calmly say, Your child belongs to us already... What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community."






I recently used one of those toilets that has separate flush options for liquid or solid waste.

Heil Hitler!

Who would have guess you were potty trained??
 
#42
#42
Umm... I didn't claim the Nazis were conservative and right wing. Good call on that one. Perhaps you should loosen up the aluminum foil helmet to allow for proper blood flow to the brain
Posted via VolNation Mobile

So why did you post that you couldn't wait for the 'nazis were fanatilcal leftists' argument?

What were they if not fanatical leftists?

Want to address the issue of this adminstration, particularly hitlery and barry on the Kenya and sharia law issue????

Matter of fact what are barry and hitlery if not fanatical leftists?
 
#43
#43
So why did you post that you couldn't wait for the 'nazis were fanatilcal leftists' argument?

Because they weren't. Nazism and both other well-known versions of fascism exhibited every bit as much in the way of far right wing politics as they did far left. The political spectrum simply isn't linear. Had you bothered to read what I wrote to you to begin with, you would not be asking me the same question that I already answered. Were they fanatical leftists? No. Were the fanatical right wingers? No. They can't simply be labeled left or right wing because they weren't simply left or right wing. Again, to profess that they were either is to completely ignore the actual makeup of fascist politics. These governments existed as amalgams of extremist elements of both "sides," as much as I hate to use that word, because it is utterly useless. Like it or not, there exists an extreme right wing and and extreme left wing, and when they actually garner enough support to put themselves in power, they tend to borrow from one another and, in many cases, greatly resemble one another. In the case of the Nazis and fascists, they simply combined ridiculous elements of both leanings into one despicable form of government.

As for the part that I deleted, I have told you multiple times that I will no long discuss Kenya. Why? Mainly because of your ultra lame excuse of "I can't read pdf files on my computer" when I shot down the main piece of evidence on which you were basing our main point of contention. Give it a rest.
 
#46
#46
Because they weren't. Nazism and both other well-known versions of fascism exhibited every bit as much in the way of far right wing politics as they did far left. The political spectrum simply isn't linear. Had you bothered to read what I wrote to you to begin with, you would not be asking me the same question that I already answered. Were they fanatical leftists? No. Were the fanatical right wingers? No. They can't simply be labeled left or right wing because they weren't simply left or right wing. Again, to profess that they were either is to completely ignore the actual makeup of fascist politics. These governments existed as amalgams of extremist elements of both "sides," as much as I hate to use that word, because it is utterly useless. Like it or not, there exists an extreme right wing and and extreme left wing, and when they actually garner enough support to put themselves in power, they tend to borrow from one another and, in many cases, greatly resemble one another. In the case of the Nazis and fascists, they simply combined ridiculous elements of both leanings into one despicable form of government.

As for the part that I deleted, I have told you multiple times that I will no long discuss Kenya. Why? Mainly because of your ultra lame excuse of "I can't read pdf files on my computer" when I shot down the main piece of evidence on which you were basing our main point of contention. Give it a rest.

The word fascism comes from the Italian language
and is from the word meaning 'bundle.'

The idea was to bundle as many different voting
blocks as possible to vote for one particular party.

As in Obama trying to portray himself as some sort
of modern day Ronald Reagan.

I think you are confusing political rhetoric with actual
actions once in power.

Not left wing or right wing but 'centrists' as Fareed
Zakaria portrays himself and as the Dhimmis claim
Bubba Clinton to be.

It is political rhetoric and doesn't accurately portray
the realities.

If Obama and HR Clinton aren't extremists then there
is no such animal.

You will no longer discuss Kenya because everything
I've said was true and with the help of Obama, Kenya
now DOES have moslem sharia law incodedinto it's
constitution.

The only thing you deny is that Obama's candidate
had a written and signed contract with the islamic
leaders.

I produced a copy and the testimony of several
Christian leaders who claimed this to be true.

All you produced was the word of one moslem sheik
who claimed this wasn't true. No doubt he was
using taqqiya (lying to the enemy) to lead you astray.

Nevertheless, that was all prior to the election.

When Obama's candidate didn't win, the moslems
rioted until the Kenyan president appointed him to
be PM.

They got their way through civil violence, thousands
of Christians were murdered, some hundreds of women
and children were burned to death as they sought
sanctuary in their churches and hundreds of thousands
were displaced and ended up in refugee camps, not
to mention the thousands of homes, business and
churches destroyed. Oh, and no mosques were harmed,
go figure.

That still didn't get them the sharia law that they
wanted so Obama's little doll on a string, Hillary,
spent $50 million+ of our money in a campaign
in Kenya to help pass a referendum amending the
Kenyan constitution to set up sharia courts there.

No wonder you won't discuss it, you don't have a
leg to stand on.








You kidding? That was high-brow, high-class, and most importantly high-road. Gsvol simply doesn't throw around personal insults.

Hillary is really high brow, high class.

(Dinky Flunky takes the high road, at least he
claims to in the Jesus - Muhammed thread.)

hillary-drinking-stacked.jpg


If she should ever be elected president, do you think
her brother will be out of jail yet??

You know one would think that anyone in her position
would be able to find someone in America compenent
enough to translate one simple Russian word.

Hillary_Clinton_and_Sergey_Lavrov_reset_button.jpg


She constantly makes a fool of herself yet the liberal
media portrays her as the world's smartest woman.

3724216419_6c01426582_b.jpg


America's two leading BSers!
 
#47
#47
gsvol - "Bettering America through VolNation since 2008."

She constantly makes a fool of herself yet the liberal
media portrays her as the world's smartest

No offense... She's probably smarter than you.

It's hard to take your insults about her being a "fool" seriously when you're posting about it on a Tennessee sports site. While she is involved and trying to make a difference, you're essentially campaigning on VolNation that you could do better. Maybe you should work on getting involved. Complaining about Hillary Clinton on VN isn't going to stop her.
 
#48
#48
gsvol - "Bettering America through VolNation since 2008."



No offense... She's probably smarter than you.

It's hard to take your insults about her being a "fool" seriously when you're posting about it on a Tennessee sports site. While she is involved and trying to make a difference, you're essentially campaigning on VolNation that you could do better. Maybe you should work on getting involved. Complaining about Hillary Clinton on VN isn't going to stop her.

Probably not.

You seem to hold the world's smartest woman in
very high regard.

mimhead.gif



"On May 1st, May Day [1969], the day of the gigantic
Free Huey rally, two of Alioto's top executioners vamped
on the brothers from the Brown Community who were
attending to their own affairs. These brothers, who are
endowed with the revolutionary spirit of the Black
Panther Party defended themselves from the racist pig
gestapo [the police].

Pig Joseph Brodnik received his just reward with a big
hole in the chest. Pig Paul McGoran got his in the
mouth which was not quite enough to off him.

The revolutionary brothers escaped the huge swarm
of pigs with dogs, mace, tanks and helicopters,
proving once again that "the spirit of the people is
greater than the man's technology."

To these brothers the revolutionary people of racist
America want to say, by your revolutionary deed you
are heroes, and that you are always welcome to our
camp."

Source: Maoist Internationist Movement
Article: REVOLUTIONARY HEROS (May 11, 1969):

http://web.archive.org/web/20060717050055/http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/bpp/index.html

These are the sorts of people with which Hitlery
has aligned herself, and yet some think she would
make a great American president.

Go figga!
 

VN Store



Back
Top