Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

Its this weird psychological problem the entire far right has. They just can't understand why none of the faux scandals has ever gotten any traction. They figure that if they screech loud enough, maybe people will start paying attention to them.

But pretty obvious all they do is drive people away. Tired of hearing them cry "wolf!" only to once again have it turn out to be some manufactured controversy, based on half truths, lies, and speculation without foundation.

Are you still tired?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I just hope this scandal encourages Warren and O'Malley to run against Clinton. Please God, anyone on the Dem side except Clinton.

If I have to choose between Hillary and any Republican other than Rand Paul, I'll just refuse to vote.

I'm still on my Hillary for 2016 campaign... she's the candidate that will drive us over the cliff faster and start the reset. Lets just get this thing over with so we can start over.
 
Bad source, will not click. Please find legitimate source.

Directly from the State Department's IG report (though I'm sure you'll find a way to tell us that it's not a legit source either, because the world's gotta keep on spinning):

LINK

Emphasis mine:

So, the policy of the Clinton State Department was that is was completely unacceptable for ambassadors and embassy staff to use non-agency email systems to conduct State business.

Can you explain why what was good for the goose was not good for the gander?

Its 67 pages long. Can you tell me where it discusses the actual policy so i can take a look at that? Thanks.

CNN link for you.

State Dept. IG hammered ambassador for using private email account while Clinton was doing same thing - CNN.com
 
Lets elect someone who is solicits $$ from Saudi royals.

Well, the Bush family certainly is close to The Royal Family...

bush-and-saudi-king.jpg


20050805_v080505db-05252copy-1-515h.jpg
 
I'm still on my Hillary for 2016 campaign... she's the candidate that will drive us over the cliff faster and start the reset. Lets just get this thing over with so we can start over.

If she's voted the next POTUS she'll be the laughing stock of America because she's not a leader in anything & never will be & the butt of jokes more than now for sure. She'll be more of an embarrassment for America than Obola is now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
If she's voted the next POTUS she'll be the laughing stock of America because she's not a leader in anything & never will be & the butt of jokes more than now for sure. She'll be more of an embarrassment for America than Obola is now.

It's hard to take someone who wears a pants suit and coke bottle glasses serious. :shades:
 
Do you think Jeb would send the IRS after Tea Party Members and Christian groups? I don't. Do you think Jeb would allow the Keystone pipeline to sit on his desk for 7 years? I don't. Do you think Jeb would've signed 0bamacare? I don't. Do you think Jeb would okay the actions of Jihadists because of the Crusades? I don't. Do you think Jeb would hand out tax payer $ to loser solar companies? I don't. Do you think Jeb would completely ignore the VA scandal? I don't. Do you think Jeb would play as much golf as Obama? I dont. Do you think Jeb would've traded 5 jihadists leaders for a deserter? I don't. Do you think Jeb would've skipped the Paris March because the playoffs were on? I dont
The highlighted (if that was really the reason and not just a coincidence) would actually be a feather in Obama's cap. No need for him to have been in that photo opt among other leaders that have violated press freedoms.

As far as everything else you listed, Jeb wouldn't do the majority of those things, but he also would restore shutdown Homeland Security, stop the TSA agents molesting us at airports, overturn Obamacare. FATCA or any program that invades our privacy and he would probably support another bankster bailout or bail-in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Well, the Bush family certainly is close to The Royal Family...

bush-and-saudi-king.jpg


20050805_v080505db-05252copy-1-515h.jpg

I'm disappointed you didn't get the one of them holding hands....blah, blah, if you harbor terror, blah, blah, we would hold those responsible blah, blah, blah.
 
I don't know, but I think you'd need to establish some sort of objectively reasonable concern before I'd really be too worried about it.

:lolabove::lolabove::eek:lol::eek:lol:
:eek:lol::eek:lol::lolabove::lolabove:

You actually wrote that?
 
If she's voted the next POTUS she'll be the laughing stock of America because she's not a leader in anything & never will be & the butt of jokes more than now for sure. She'll be more of an embarrassment for America than Obola is now.

One could argue that the only thing more laughable than a mooslim socialist black president being followed by a liberal pantsuit wearing woman with cankles is the party that let it happen.

It's all about perspective.

Just saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This is just too funny. When the story broke earlier today, the accusation was that she broke the law. As the hours wore on, and the far right shriek machine realized she didn't, it shifted to be that, MAYBE, just MAYBE, she compromised national security by doing it.

No evidence.

Just speculation.

And a new theory when the first one blew up in their face.

I tell you, though, and this will make you happy, I'm tired. I'm really tired. I've been patiently explaining to you shriekers on here, posting your garbage stories, from crap blogs, always, and I mean ALWAYS, proven to be utter junk, what the actual facts are.

If Hillary wins, I'll not bother explaining to you your own level of utter retardation. I'll hang out. And mock you as you deserve. But otherwise I'll let you stew in your own soup of feigned outrage, twist in your own winds of conspiratorial whispers... and always, always, you'll be wrong. Dead wrong.

That's harsh man. I understand you get a lot of sh!t here but you should probably either ignore it completely or just address it with a more polite demeanor. You aren't going to talk sense into anyone by insulting them back, so why bother? This should be more civil than treating politics like some kind of game where you get to call the other side morons when they're wrong, I dunno
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
That's harsh man. I understand you get a lot of sh!t here but you should probably either ignore it completely or just address it with a more polite demeanor. You aren't going to talk sense into anyone by insulting them back, so why bother? This should be more civil than treating politics like some kind of game where you get to call the other side morons when they're wrong, I dunno

Politics is adult playground four square squabbling
 
I'm still on my Hillary for 2016 campaign... she's the candidate that will drive us over the cliff faster and start the reset. Lets just get this thing over with so we can start over.

Of all people, Rush Limbaugh had an interesting take on Hillary the other day. Said that she gets reported on as if she is the inevitable 50 year old Hillary when in reality she's a McCain-like figure to a huge chunk of the electorate.
 
It really is. It's like some weird circle of hell where everybody passive aggressively insults one another.

So lucky someone of YOUR intelligence is here to point that out.

:)
 
This Romanian hacker "Guccifer" better watch his back. The Clintons always have the last word.
 

VN Store



Back
Top