Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

[Mick]

This. It's not about right/left - it's about right/wrong. It's about expecting our elected leaders are not complete crooks. It's about holding people accountable.

There is no doubt she deliberately with held information from an investigation. What's worse is she set up the system to allow her to do this and then followed through by destroying records so no one can verify her actions.

To top it off, anyone looking at the situation can see clearly that it stinks yet we get the Baghdad Bob treatment from Team Hillary.

We are continually treated like idiots and unfortunately continue to live up to that treatment.

It is scandalous by any definition of the term. Sadly people will still vote for her in droves due to Red vs Blue.

She is the opposite of what our founders envisioned in terms of being accountable to the people yet chances are strong she'll be the next POTUS.

Not fishy at all.



‘President Hillary Clinton?’ She Wants Progress on Immigration and to Drink With G.O.P.

You don't prosecute me and I'll keep you as AG. Makes sense.

You were saying?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

You were saying?

???

 

[ajvol01]

???

He's grasping for straws as the Russian collusion hoax disintegrates.

 

[Mick]

???

Handy reference guide for the political climate.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

He's grasping for straws as the Russian collusion hoax disintegrates.

Its still baffling how Mick and others just gloss over Hillarys perjury. When there is irrefutable evidence? Nah it aint a crime because muh Hillary. Zero evidence against Trump? Oh he absolutely is guilty.

 

[Mick]

Again, how can you support her for the most sensitive and powerful of all positions in the world when she clearly demonstrated her own personal beliefs and motivations are placed above those of the government that she would be running? This is what I do not get. Do you truly believe that she has completely above board and most importantly her personal/private server has been secure and immune to any kind of hack? How can you possibly believe this?

That is not the progressive way. Transcripts etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.... They will tell us what we have the right to know, and the liberals will lap it up like so much expensive Champagne because their leadership said so. No thought on their part required or solicited.

I disagree. She held a sensitive office that directly affects national security. We have the right to know if she compromised that security. She is not a private citizen in this regard, she is a public official, and the public has a right to know what she was up to. IF it was all benign and did not affect that security, then she was just plain stupid and naive to do that because it opens her up to this investigation. Hillary Clinton is as naive as I am female though. You are naive for giving her a pass.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I'm curious as to the points you're making?

The FBI went on prime time during the election and told us she broke the law, but the DoJ instructed them not to indict her.

Trump has been investigated from colon to tonsils and they've said they can't find anything to indict him on.

You're claiming this is similar?

 

[golfballs]

 

[Roustabout]

I'm curious as to the points you're making?

The FBI went on prime time during the election and told us she broke the law, but the DoJ instructed them not to indict her.

Trump has been investigated from colon to tonsils and they've said they can't find anything to indict him on.

You're claiming this is similar?

Not to mention that it was a drummed up scheme by the DNC. You know, the same party that manipulated the campaign to get Hillary nominated.

 

[ajvol01]

Wow. Pretty damning for all of her staff who claimed to know nothing of the private email server.

 

[nuclearjunky]

He said “ we’re working with Monica to HAMMER OUT the details”...... that’s freakin hilarious.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

What's your point Cletus?

 

[ajvol01]

What's your point Cletus?

He's quoting your correct statements?

 

[evillawyer]

Appeals court blocks Hillary Clinton deposition on private email server

 

[NEO]

Appeals court blocks Hillary Clinton deposition on private email server

You mean a liberal group of DC judges appointed by Obama blocked it and protected one of their own???

You dont say.......

 

[NorthDallas40]

The people demand an en banc review! That’s the process now right?

 

[LouderVol]

I was kinda hoping Trump had been caught doing this so it would become a real/non issue.

This may be one unintended good consquence of him not giving two effs.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Appeals court blocks Hillary Clinton deposition on private email server

Wow. So this makes you happy?

 

[RockyTop85]

You mean a liberal group of DC judges appointed by Obama blocked it and protected one of their own???

You dont say.......

“Wilkins was joined in the panel decision by Judges Cornelia Pillard, another Obama appointee, and Thomas Griffith, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush.”

Any evidence Griffith is a “liberal DC judge” or are you relying on the “he’s a liberal because he sided with Hillary, he sided with Hillary because he’s a liberal,” circle jerk?

Wasn’t Kavanaugh a Bush appointee to the DC Circuit at one point? Maybe I’ve got that wrong.

 

[NEO]

“Wilkins was joined in the panel decision by Judges Cornelia Pillard, another Obama appointee, and Thomas Griffith, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush.”

Any evidence Griffith is a “liberal DC judge” or are you relying on the “he’s a liberal because he sided with Hillary, he sided with Hillary because he’s a liberal,” circle jerk?

Wasn’t Kavanaugh a Bush appointee to the DC Circuit at one point? Maybe I’ve got that wrong.

Bush can kiss my ass!

Both Bush's.

 

[RockyTop85]

Bush can kiss my ass!

Both Bush's.

I’ll take that as a “no.”

Sometimes court decisions are based on... you know... the law.

 

[LouderVol]

I honestly havent read. What was the reasoning?

I’ll take that as a “no.”

Sometimes court decisions are based on... you know... the law.

 

[NEO]

I’ll take that as a “no.”

Lol.

Bush gave us Roberts, useless wars, Dodd Frank, and ushered in Obama.

He is Obama light.

What is your point?

They our judges appointed by the 2 worst presidents in modern times since Carter.

Both were horrible Presidents and his daddy was too....who gave us NAFTA by the way.

I stand by my comment.

 

[hog88]

Lol.

Bush gave us Roberts, useless wars, Dodd Frank, and ushered in Obama.

He is Obama light.

What is your point?

They our judges appointed by the 2 worst presidents in modern times since Carter.

Both were horrible Presidents and his daddy was too....who gave us NAFTA by the way.

I stand by my comment.

I disagree with you about George 1. He wasn't bad.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I disagree with you about George 1. He wasn't bad.

Bush 41 not only knew where most of the skeletons in the closets are in DC he placed a large number of them there. Where there’s smoke there is fire and boy was there a bunch of smoke around 41 over the years. Back to the Warren Commission.