House leadership playing chicken again ....

#2
#2
The Democratic-controlled Senate rejected a House GOP temporary spending bill
Click to expand...

good for both sides. The less they do the better off we are
 
#4
#4
i took away from the debates that the republicans are wanting to head back to strong states and weak federal which i'm cool with. i could see 50 mini countries coming our way of certain states dont get their act together.
 
#5
#5
Gonna be ugly for them if the Dems can successfully pin them with cutting funding to deal with tornadoes and hurricanes.
 
#6
#6
of course the Dems would be dishonest enough to say it's all about that

One key sticking point is that the House bill requires that the $1 billion in immediate disaster funding be offset with $1.5 billion in cuts to a loan program that helps automakers retool their operations to make more fuel-efficient cars. Another $100 million would be cut from an alternative energy loan program that provided funding for the solar panel firm Solyndra, a company that declared bankruptcy late last month despite receiving a $535 million federal guarantee in 2009.
Click to expand...

you claim to be for cuts but when they come up the left just shoots them down. Just a bunch of liars
 
#7
#7
NEOCON said:
i took away from the debates that the republicans are wanting to head back to strong states and weak federal which i'm cool with. i could see 50 mini countries coming our way of certain states dont get their act together.
Click to expand...


Yes, that way you could corral all of the poor blacks into, like, 6 or 7 states and then cut them off from welfare.
 
#9
#9
utvolpj said:
ah the racist angle in less than 10 posts. You're a clown
Click to expand...


When I see someone touting the equivalent of secession, no matter how they obviously try to dress it up, I can't help but come to the correct conclusion that its more "If we could just get rid of 'them,' it would all be alright."
 
#10
#10
clown.jpg
 
#11
#11
lawgator1 said:
When I see someone touting the equivalent of secession, no matter how they obviously try to dress it up, I can't help but come to the correct conclusion that its more "If we could just get rid of 'them,' it would all be alright."
Click to expand...

:shakehead:
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#12
#12
lawgator1 said:
When I see someone touting the equivalent of secession, no matter how they obviously try to dress it up, I can't help but come to the correct conclusion that its more "If we could just get rid of 'them,' it would all be alright."
Click to expand...

Keeps getting better.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
lawgator1 said:
When I see someone touting the equivalent of secession, no matter how they obviously try to dress it up, I can't help but come to the correct conclusion that its more "If we could just get rid of 'them,' it would all be alright."
Click to expand...

what kind of moron equates a weak federal government (as codified within the Constitution) with secession and slavery?

that's a rhetorical question, btw, since we already know that you're that kind of moron.
 
#14
#14
#15
#15
lawgator1 said:
Yes, that way you could corral all of the poor blacks into, like, 6 or 7 states and then cut them off from welfare.
Click to expand...

Did anyone at any point say or even think of race except for the true racist here? In case you didn't guess, that's you.

If you think even a sliver of a minority of conservative whites want to see suppression of blacks or to see them "corral(ed)" into anything... then you are even more detached from reality than even I thought.
 
#16
#16
MG1968 said:
what kind of moron equates a weak federal government (as codified within the Constitution) with secession and slavery?

that's a rhetorical question, btw, since we already know that you're that kind of moron.
Click to expand...

You like the Constituiton!? Racist, imo
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#17
#17
dreVol said:
You like the Constituiton!? Racist, imo
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Even worse if you believe in the concept of "rule of law" or "equal in the eyes of the law"... that everyone should truly be treated the same.... in a genuinely color blind society... then you are the worst kind of racist.
 
#18
#18
sjt18 said:
Even worse if you believe in the concept of "rule of law" or "equal in the eyes of the law"... that everyone should truly be treated the same.... in a genuinely color blind society... then you are the worst kind of racist.
Click to expand...

If everyone is treated the same, rampant racism will ensue. Book it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#19
#19
MG1968 said:
what kind of moron equates a weak federal government (as codified within the Constitution) with secession and slavery?

that's a rhetorical question, btw, since we already know that you're that kind of moron.
Click to expand...


What kind of moron ignores the remark that neocon could "see 50 mini countries coming our way if certain states don't get their act together" ?


NEOCON said:
i took away from the debates that the republicans are wanting to head back to strong states and weak federal which i'm cool with. i could see 50 mini countries coming our way of certain states dont get their act together.
Click to expand...



"50 mini-countries"

LOL
 
#20
#20
I must be a supreme moron. I've become quite adept at ignoring Neocon.
 
#23
#23
Senate blocks emergency disaster money - Washington Times

Calling for a weekend to “cool off,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid set up a Monday vote on replenishing the almost-empty federal disaster relief accounts as all sides race to beat a deadline to keep money money flowing to disaster-stricken states and to keep the federal government at large running.

“Cool off a little bit. Work this through. There’s a compromise here,” Mr. Reid said Friday, minutes after the Senate blocked back a bill drafted by House Republicans that would have replenished the disaster fund accounts through Nov. 18.
Click to expand...
 
#25
#25
lawgator1 said:
When I see someone touting the equivalent of secession, no matter how they obviously try to dress it up, I can't help but come to the correct conclusion that its more "If we could just get rid of 'them,' it would all be alright."
Click to expand...

You can't help but come a conclusion, that does not make it correct. Was it racist for Georgia (the other one) to leave the USSR? Was it racist for Lithuania? What about when the original 13 colonies seceded from the United Kingdom? How does one automatically equate the dissolution of political bonds between geographic areas to be a blatantly racist event?

lawgator1 said:
What kind of moron ignores the remark that neocon could "see 50 mini countries coming our way if certain states don't get their act together" ?

"50 mini-countries"

LOL
Click to expand...

Why does ignoring that comment make one a moron? You disagree with him, correct? Wouldn't that mean you would want people to ignore him and his opinion? What kind of a moron gives credence to an obviously 'wrong' opinion and insists that others give it similar credence? Would you prefer morons who pay attention to his opinion? Is being logically consistent an important intellectual tool in your mind?

BTW, Neocon, I am not calling your opinion wrong or saying it is moronic, I am pointing out someone else's absurdity. Although, I see the federal government as never loosening its grip and allowing any kind of balkanization here, no matter how helpful it may have proven to be in other parts of the world.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top