How Feminism will destroy Western Society (see the black community)

#1
Rasputin_Vol

Rasputin_Vol

"Slava Ukraina"
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
72,056
Likes
39,845
#1
These two videos are essentially saying what I have been saying all along. This woman hits the nail on the head again, and again and again... The black community in America is simply the canary in the coal mine for larger society. Until you guys (white folks) remove these incentives for women to reproduce with random men with no consequence... and you continue to subsidize these women... the US society will collapse within 2 generations.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w__PJ8ymliw[/youtube]

**********************************************

So you say you want a Matriarchy?

______________________________________________
 
#8
#8
IBlvNTmWrk said:
Can't. Listen. To. 36 Minute. Video. On. Feminism.

Care to summarize?
Click to expand...

1) The the deterioration of the nuclear family is at the heart of many of our socioeconomic problems.

2) Feminism is backfiring big time. It is simply economically inefficient.
 
#9
#9
With no male structure in a house hold the kids will be buck ass wild!! Little boys will never be men with out a male paterfamilias. Little girls will end up on the stripper pole with 3 unwed kids with out a strong male paterfamilias. And believe it or not that snatch rules the world and man will pay for it whether he marries her or visit the bunny ranch in Nevada.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
Rasputin_Vol said:
Now, contrast these two videos with this video from a black woman. She is actually giving dating tips for women on how to date a thug. I swear, the black community is going down the toilet.

Thugs, Players, Bad Boys and Street Dudes
Click to expand...

WTF?????? Really?????? I know you and I have had the discussion on why women no matter their color go after "thugs". My country ass ain't good enough. Women are crazy
 
#11
#11
You guys better wake up... :p

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYb5xSd4PRs&feature=g-u-u&context=G2551771FUAAAAAAAHAA[/youtube]
 
#13
#13
PKT_VOL said:
1) The the deterioration of the nuclear family is at the heart of many of our socioeconomic problems.

2) Feminism is backfiring big time. It is simply economically inefficient.
Click to expand...

:hi:

Great summary, and I agree. Unfortunately the problem is not just the immediate family, but the lack of a close extended family as well.
 
#14
#14
IBlvNTmWrk said:
Can't. Listen. To. 36 Minute. Video. On. Feminism.

Care to summarize?
Click to expand...

I listened and agree.

In the old days the marriage contract provided for a sound economic model where the excess labor of the male was sold for the reproductive capacity of the female.

Feminism overturned that arrangement and now women are able to make unilateral reproductive decisions without regard to the desires of the male. The single biggest factor is the lack of accountability in the system. the lack of accountability is seen in things like no fault divorces for nothing more than dissatisfaction, out of wedlock pregnancy without perhaps even knowledge by the father, courts that automatically defer parental rights to the woman and social/economic rules that provide incentives for women to leave the workforce after taking training and educational opportunities from men.

The lack of accountability has brought about a system that relies upon an increasing amount of labor by men to maintain it, while at the same time, reducing the incentives of men to provide that extra work. As women who follow the feminist agenda continue to drain resources and men continue to lose motivation to provide those resources, the system is doomed to collapse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#15
#15
One big issue is that for many years society has been telling men that they should be more like women. To step down as the leader of the family. And they have. Men have allowed women to rule the family and it has caused considerable damage to our society. It isn't politically correct to say it, but it's a fact. Men need to pick it up and be leaders in their own homes. That doesn't mean become a dictator nor does it mean he has to be the sole or primary breadwinner. It means he has to be responsible for his wife, his kids, and his family as a whole. Watch "Courageous"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
superdave1984 said:
Men have allowed women to rule the family and it has caused considerable damage to our society. It isn't politically correct to say it, but it's a fact. Men need to pick it up and be leaders in their own homes.
Click to expand...

what is the damage caused and why does a family require the man to be the leader in the house?
 
#17
#17
utvolpj said:
what is the damage caused and why does a family require the man to be the leader in the house?
Click to expand...

Check the stats on inmates. Check discipline in schools because men have become namby pamby in their own homes. Check these same things back in the 40's or 50's and get back to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#18
#18
superdave1984 said:
Check the stats on inmates. Check discipline in schools because men have become namby pamby in their own homes. Check these same things back in the 40's or 50's and get back to me.
Click to expand...

I would think those would be affected more by non-existent fathers than "namby pamby" ones

but why would that require men to be "leaders in their own home" to fix? I personally view my marriage and raising my son to be a partnership

all this reeks of being scared of strong women
 
#19
#19
superdave1984 said:
One big issue is that for many years society has been telling men that they should be more like women. To step down as the leader of the family. And they have. Men have allowed women to rule the family and it has caused considerable damage to our society. It isn't politically correct to say it, but it's a fact. Men need to pick it up and be leaders in their own homes. That doesn't mean become a dictator nor does it mean he has to be the sole or primary breadwinner. It means he has to be responsible for his wife, his kids, and his family as a whole. Watch "Courageous"
Click to expand...

I dunno that I agree with that at all. I see nothing wrong with a woman being "head of a household" or duel head of household responsibilities. I definitely don't see the necessity for a male dominated household.

The video was more about the macro economics of matriarchy.
 
#20
#20
utvolpj said:
what is the damage caused and why does a family require the man to be the leader in the house?
Click to expand...

First off, let me start with the usual disclaimer of "not all". But...

In general, most single female lead households tend to lead to dysfunction. The statistics back this up, especially in the black community where 70% of children today are born out of wedlock to single females. The fact is that nearly every negative social ill (drug use, teen pregnancy, incarceration, drop out rates etc) is directly proportional to the rate of out of wedlock/single female lead household rates.

In addition, even if you have a man that is in a household with a female head, the chances are that most of the time (again, not all, but most), the female and the larger society will still hold the man responsible and accountable when things go south in that household. Even though the female may have been the sole or chief decision maker, when times get tough or when things get bumpy, that woman and people in general will look at the man and hold him accountable. So, since the man will be held accountable and made to be the one to fix/clean up the mess anyways, he needs to be the one being the chief decision maker and having the control. What you have right now is women wanting the power of a man, the benefits of a woman (meaning that she will still want to be vatered to and allowed to fall back on her ovaries when the heavy lifting needs to be done) and the responsibility of neither. Meaning that, not only do they not want to be held accountable for decisions that they made in the household that men normally are held accountable for making, but they also don't want the traditional responsibilities associated with women, such as cooking/cleaning/raising children. Again, not all, but most.

This is an example of what I'm talking about in this video. Now I bet you that before the economic downturn when things were good, this woman (and women like her) were more than willing to grab on to the feminist mantra of being strong and independent and wanting to be known as a contributor (if not chief decions maker) in the household. But now, they want to hide behind their ovaries and all of a sudden, they want to hold the man accountable.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkSV_R82xzI&list=FLhk81r7KHo2hhT683Fx0ufQ&index=86&feature=plpp_video[/youtube]
 
#22
#22
GAVol said:
Where to even begin.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Where can you begin? Slavery didn't even break up the black family. We still had marriage rates in the black community up until the mid-60's that were 60% 100 years after slavery. But in just 2 generations, the numbers have flipped (due to gov't playing father & husband) and feminism to where it is now 70% of children born out of wedlock.

And you know what? The numbers in the white community during that same time are going up, also. Obviously, not as high, but you still are seeing escalating divorce rates and out of wedlock births creeping up. You guys have got to save us and yourselves. If we don't place any importance on building strong nuclear families, then in 40-50 years, this whole society will be a dumpster fire. You'll have a bunch of unaccountable females raising males with no structure and no guidance. That leads to what you see in A Clockwork Orange or on the mean streets of Newark, Detroit, Memphis, New Orleans, St. Louis, etc...
 
#23
#23
Even Charles Murray is hitting the panic button...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_SAhJMG8JA[/youtube]
 
#24
#24
I watched some ***** nearly kill a 12 year old pedestrian turning right on a red today. Thought about beating her silly, not gonna lie. She acted like it was the kids fault.
 
#25
#25
Rasputin_Vol said:
Exactly.

Where can you begin? Slavery didn't even break up the black family. We still had marriage rates in the black community up until the mid-60's that were 60% 100 years after slavery. But in just 2 generations, the numbers haven flipped (due to gov't playing father & husband) and feminism to where it is now 70% of children born out of wedlock.

And you know what? The numbers in the white community during that same time are going up, also. Obviously, not as high, but you still are seeing escalating divorce rates and out of wedlock births creeping up. You guys have got to save us and yourselves. If we don't place any importance on building strong nuclear families, then in 40-50 years, this whole society will be a dumpster fire. You'll have a bunch of unaccountable females raising males with no structure and no guidance. That leads to what you see in A Clockwork Orange or on the mean streets of Newark, Detroit, Memphis, New Orleans, St. Louis, etc...
Click to expand...
You guys have to save yourselves. Some of us have most of this figured out. The ones that have it figured out for the most part are raising a family them selves and don't have time to take care of everybody else's family. In my opinion there's no way to fix the problem The government just has to stop paying for it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top