VolunteerHillbilly
Spike Drinks, Not Trees
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 40,778
- Likes
- 15,192
Yuuuuup.He's got a high football IQ, but so much of CFB comes down to the ability to make big plays. I mean look at Saban...he doesn't lose to pocket QB's. He loses to dual-threat guys. That's why you take Fields over Fromm, IMO.
He's got a high football IQ, but so much of CFB comes down to the ability to make big plays. I mean look at Saban...he doesn't lose to pocket QB's. He loses to dual-threat guys. That's why you take Fields over Fromm, IMO.
He also made an incredibly interesting statement after the South Carolina loss last year. He walked up to the podium after the game and the very first thing he said was that the difference in the game was Georgia not being able to create enough turnovers to even up the turnover margin. In Kirby's mind, the difference in the game was not that his offense (Fromm specifically) turned the ball over 4 times, but that his defense didn't generate any to make up for it.You’re right, DT QB’s have given Saban the most problems. It’s bad that I can quickly make a list of the QB’s Saban has lost to because it happens so infrequently.
Also, has anyone listened to Kirby defend his offense from last year? He basically said that his QB’s wouldn’t get hurt as much being a typical PP, pro form QB and that was his reasoning.
As the HC he knows it's a balance. If the D cant generate turnovers the O better not commit any. If the O is causing turnovers the D better step up.He also made an incredibly interesting statement after the South Carolina loss last year. He walked up to the podium after the game and the very first thing he said was that the difference in the game was Georgia not being able to create enough turnovers to even up the turnover margin. In Kirby's mind, the difference in the game was not that his offense (Fromm specifically) turned the ball over 4 times, but that his defense didn't generate any to make up for it.
I thought that was a totally idiotic and stupid assessment/interpretation of what had just occurred - that's fine to think in those terms if you're still a DC, but he's the HC now.
As the HC he knows it's a balance. If the D cant generate turnovers the O better not commit any. If the O is causing turnovers the D better step up.
The offenses goal is score 1 more point than their defense allows, and the Ds goal is to allow one less point than the offense scores. It's a seesaw so I dont see smarts comments as wrong.
What huff said. There's a certain amount of luck involved in forcing turnovers, and the numbers show it is hard to consistently do it from game to game, season to season. If the offense is turning it over, then they need to stop freaking making them.As the HC he knows it's a balance. If the D cant generate turnovers the O better not commit any. If the O is causing turnovers the D better step up.
The offenses goal is score 1 more point than their defense allows, and the Ds goal is to allow one less point than the offense scores. It's a seesaw so I dont see smarts comments as wrong.
Absolutely uncanny how similar Kirby's first 3 seasons at Georgia are compared to Richt's first 3 seasons. Even down to specific losses.My opinion is Fromm has bust written all over him, same as Tua. Neither will be surrounded by a stupid big talent advantage in the Pros. They are going to have to actually play the position on an equal playing field.
As far as Smart, this just continues the argument he really is Richt 2.0, and maybe even worse given the talent he has assembled while achieving the same hardware results in the trophy case.
The turnovers + Georgia's offensive line, who the media creamed their pants over last year, got dominated by South Carolina's defensive line.After all this time I STILL don't see how USCjr beat the dawgs, but I LOVE it.
I didnt watch the game so I dont know what Georgia did or didnt do. Did they ever dial up the pressure, change schemes or protections?You can't just decide to force turnovers, tho. SC played it super conservative. They only passed for 155 yards and 46 of those came on a first-half TD.
Eh. 5th round pick its hard to call someone a bust if they don't work out.My opinion is Fromm has bust written all over him, same as Tua. Neither will be surrounded by a stupid big talent advantage in the Pros. They are going to have to actually play the position on an equal playing field.
As far as Smart, this just continues the argument he really is Richt 2.0, and maybe even worse given the talent he has assembled while achieving the same hardware results in the trophy case.
Kind of similar in the fact they both overachieved in year 2. Richt couldn’t beat Florida, while Kirby is having his way with them. Kirby has also played more ranked teams and top 10 teams through 4 years and actually has a winning record against top 10 opponents. Doubt anyone would say Richt wasn’t successful early on, but his issues came later. Richt fielded competitive teams once every 5 years. 2002, 2007, and 2012 were the only years he had UGA in contention. So far Kirby has had UGA there in 3 out of 4 years. Richt in his prime vs Kirby in his prime would be an interesting conversation, but not current Richt vs current Kirby.Absolutely uncanny how similar Kirby's first 3 seasons at Georgia are compared to Richt's first 3 seasons. Even down to specific losses.
Georgia fans really don't want to admit that, and often deflect to irrelevant points (e.g., Kirby is a hardass out of the Saban mold and is the better recruiter while Richt was like a preacher), but the on-the-field similarities are there.
Current Richt vs. Current Kirby I don't think is the relevant basis for comparison though. There's no doubt Current Kirby is better than Current or 5 years ago Richt.Kind of similar in the fact they both overachieved in year 2. Richt couldn’t beat Florida, while Kirby is having his way with them. Kirby has also played more ranked teams and top 10 teams through 4 years and actually has a winning record against top 10 opponents. Doubt anyone would say Richt wasn’t successful early on, but his issues came later. Richt fielded competitive teams once every 5 years. 2002, 2007, and 2012 were the only years he had UGA in contention. So far Kirby has had UGA there in 3 out of 4 years. Richt in his prime vs Kirby in his prime would be an interesting conversation, but not current Richt vs current Kirby.
IMO it’s relevant since UGA didn’t have the option of Prime Richt at the time of the change. The main difference, imo, is Kirby having played more ranked opponents and having a better record against top 10 opponents. Looking back it’s also a bit odd how ppl considered Richt consistent when he only fielded competitive teams once every 5 years, though that could just be recency bias.Current Richt vs. Current Kirby I don't think is the relevant basis for comparison though. There's no doubt Current Kirby is better than Current or 5 years ago Richt.
Both Kirby and Richt arrived at Georgia as young, fresh-faced assistants seeking to put their stamp on a program thought to be underachieving. In each of their first 3 years, their performance was very similar. There was a difference in Year 4...Kirby played for the SEC title again while Richt did not.
I think you're defining "competitive team" as "a team that can win a national title," which is a really high bar. I would define "competitive team" as a team that is basically always relevant - either winning hardware, almost winning hardware, or being in a realistic conversation about potentially winning hardware. Georgia was basically always relevant when Richt was their coach, in contrast to a team like Tennessee, which hasn't been relevant in over a decade.IMO it’s relevant since UGA didn’t have the option of Prime Richt at the time of the change. The main difference, imo, is Kirby having played more ranked opponents and having a better record against top 10 opponents. Looking back it’s also a bit odd how ppl considered Richt consistent when he only fielded competitive teams once every 5 years, though that could just be recency bias.
For competitive I meant a team being in the hunt until the conference championship and finishing top 10. I was young during Richt’s early years, but I never remember him staying in the top 10 consistently. What plagued Richt and eventually cost him his job was playing down to the competition and not winning big games. He definitely left the program in a better condition than he found it though.I think you're defining "competitive team" as "a team that can win a national title," which is a really high bar. I would define "competitive team" as a team that is basically always relevant - either winning hardware, almost winning hardware, or being in a realistic conversation about potentially winning hardware. Georgia was basically always relevant when Richt was their coach, in contrast to a team like Tennessee, which hasn't been relevant in over a decade.
Richt was consistent because he won at least 9 games in 11 of his 15 seasons. He only had a couple years that I would call stinkers - 2009 and 2010. Is Georgia capable of more than that? Yes, which is why he was fired, but he did consistently field good teams.
IMO, Richt is Phil Fulmer except his highs weren't as high and his lows weren't as low as Fulmer's were. Fulmer won a national title that Richt never got, but also had 2 5-win seasons and recruiting fall off a cliff that Richt never had.
During Richt's first 7 seasons, he finished in the top 10 5 times.For competitive I meant a team being in the hunt until the conference championship and finishing top 10. I was young during Richt’s early years, but I never remember him staying in the top 10 consistently. What plagued Richt and eventually cost him his job was playing down to the competition and not winning big games. He definitely left the program in a better condition than he found it though.
My opinion is Fromm has bust written all over him, same as Tua. Neither will be surrounded by a stupid big talent advantage in the Pros. They are going to have to actually play the position on an equal playing field.
As far as Smart, this just continues the argument he really is Richt 2.0, and maybe even worse given the talent he has assembled while achieving the same hardware results in the trophy case.
To be fair, a lot of the hesitancy about signing Cam today is his injury history, and rightly or wrongly many people see his poor play the last couple years as a function of him not being healthy, not because he sucks and should have been a career backup. He's also now on the wrong side of 30 (he'll be 31 when the season starts). If he's healthy, and that's a gigantic if, he's probably still good enough to start somewhere.I agree with this.
2 things that jumped out at me from that article were saying that Fromm will be lucky to develop into a backup..if that....and Cam Newton already labeled as a backup QB. I hate Cam, always have. I live in Charlotte and am a Panthers fan..but only with a fraction of the passion I have for the Vols. I couldnt wait to get rid of Scam, and it speaks volumes when he is released and immediately considered a backup by the rest of the league. If nobody else in the NFL wants Scam as a starter, that's embarrassing that he WAS the franchise QB here...for far too long.
BTW...I stayed up late at night to see the announcement of whether or not we would get a franchise in Charlotte..have been a Panthers fan since before we chose the name Panthers...when we went to the SuperBowl against Peyton and the Broncos...I pulled for Peyton to get his 2nd ring in a house and city full of Panthers fans. Wore my UT Jersey in fact. I am a VFL.
Also...love to see Georgia get a rep for squandering QBs while we have Peyton as our advocate. Helps us get the 5 stars. Also, Smart is no Richt. He does even less, with more talent, and is not half the stand up Christian man Richt is. I never liked Richt, but I always respected him for being a good man and a Brother in Christ. Smart is a used car salesman...just like Butch. He just came from the Saban tree and had doors opened for him. Cant stand the guy.
To be fair, a lot of the hesitancy about signing Cam today is his injury history, and rightly or wrongly many people see his poor play the last couple years as a function of him not being healthy, not because he sucks and should have been a career backup. He's also now on the wrong side of 30 (he'll be 31 when the season starts). If he's healthy, and that's a gigantic if, he's probably still good enough to start somewhere.
Having said that, I've always personally thought he was overrated as an NFL QB, even early in his career when he was young/healthy/more productive. If it wasn't for the 2015 season where he won MVP and had his SB run, he'd have absolutely nothing to hang his hat on as an NFL QB.
Cam was willing the Panthers to victory in 2018 and he could hardly throw. By the end of the year it was apparent to everybody and it became easy to stop him, kinda like with Peyton.
People hate on him so bad and it clouds their evaluation of him. His personality drives me crazy too, but you have to respect his game. Refs really did let teams just tee off on him like no other modern QB. It's pretty messed up.