How labor unions prolonged the great depression.

[allvol123]

The short answers.

1.It would be dependent on the job and the company.

2.Arbitration.typicaly more benefits.Some unions do operate that way,not all.

Seems to be working out wonderfully for GM and Chrysler.

 

[allvol123]

If it took such skill along with your unique experience, why the need for the union membership?

Skip this one OB2?

 

[orangeblooded2]

again, why is it about "benefits"? Why should a company be forced to pay 95% of an employee's health insurance premiums? And why would a union go on strike when the company wants the employee to pay 5% more?

again, there isn't a single benefit a union can negotiate by force that an employer can't offer simply as a means of attracting and retaining the best and most qualified applicants.

When you learn to answer a question........

What you do is not debate!

 

[orangeblooded2]

Seems to be working out wonderfully for GM and Chrysler.

See post #15.



:bed_time:

 

[MG1968]

When you learn to answer a question........

What you do is not debate!

Unions suck. end of debate.

I win. :rock:

 

[allvol123]

Form my perspective and experience I would argue that the answer to both questions is the same.

Management or rather Mismanagement.


Today's unions understand timely effective work and the need for quality but the responsibility for operational practices and production models and modernization to effect quality is solely based,with a few good exceptions,squarely on the business in question.

Do you think management will ever take responsibility,when they always have a union to blame.

You mean this post 15?

The part in bold is some of the most laughable scribble I ever seen posted on this site.

As to your last comment. Management takes almost all responsibility, that is why they are management. On the other hand, the jobs monkeys can perform obviously need protection.

 

[orangeblooded2]

I get my jollies being a poser.

I wish I understood what a ? mark was :rock:

fyp

 

[orangeblooded2]

You mean this post 15?

The part in bold is some of the most laughable scribble I ever seen posted on this site.

As to your last comment. Management takes almost all responsibility, that is why they are management. On the other hand, the jobs monkeys can perform obviously need protection.

I think I understand were MG1968 got his failed tactical construct for debate from.

Poser and mini poser.By seniority of course

 

[MG1968]

Form my perspective and experience I would argue that the answer to both questions is the same.

Management or rather Mismanagement.


Today's unions understand timely effective work and the need for quality but the responsibility for operational practices and production models and modernization to effect quality is solely based,with a few good exceptions,squarely on the business in question.

Do you think management will ever take responsibility,when they always have a union to blame.

When you learn to answer a question........

What you do is not debate!

Unions suck. end of debate.

I win. :rock:

fyp

that's post 15 at the top, unedited by me. If I'm a "poser" for not understanding a question mark, what does that make you for not including the punctuation itself?

In the case of the Big 3, I don't remember any of the executives blaming the union. It's only natural that they will point to the UAW as being a problem since even Travis the Chimp knew that the UAW was slowly destroying the companies.

Management's problem was that they tried to be capitalists and have their companies produce the cars their customers demanded.

 

[orangeblooded2]

that's post 15 at the top, unedited by me. If I'm a "poser" for not understanding a question mark, what does that make you for not including the punctuation itself?

In the case of the Big 3, I don't remember any of the executives blaming the union. It's only natural that they will point to the UAW as being a problem since even Travis the Chimp knew that the UAW was slowly destroying the companies.

Management's problem was that they tried to be capitalists and have their companies produce the cars their customers demanded.

Now thats what I,m talking about.Thank you.

 

[allvol123]

Management's problem was that they tried to be capitalists and have their companies produce the cars their customers demanded.

Management's problem was that they bowed to the feet of the unions for far too long. They should have brought this thing to a head years(or decades) ago.

 

[JTrainDavis]

Unions suck. end of debate.

I win. :rock:

Being from a union state, i wholeheartedly agree.

 

[beergood]

Now thats what I,m talking about.Thank you.

And this means what???