How many teams from SEC?

#27
#27
I guess this board will be a bunch of gator fans when Florida plays Kentucky
 
#32
#32
So funny when people say something smart alecy and they don't even know what they're talking about.
 
#40
#40
I see 3-5 teams making it unless something crazy happens in the tourney.

UF and Mizzu (which everyone has) and then at least one if not all three of UT, Ole Miss, and KY.

Tennessee has to win at least 3 more games and I see Ole Miss and KY need to make a deep SECT run. Gonna be interesting how the last 2 games of the regular season play out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#41
#41
Is ks on the bubble? These may not be bad losses but they aren't what I call good losses either.

No offense, but you are not on the selection committee, so who cares whether you consider a loss good or bad. The criteria they use for a bad loss is teams that are not in the top 100 of the RPI. What anybody else thinks about our losses is irrelevant.
 
#42
#42
No offense, but you are not on the selection committee, so who cares whether you consider a loss good or bad. The criteria they use for a bad loss is teams that are not in the top 100 of the RPI. What anybody else thinks about our losses is irrelevant.

But that's not to say that we can't refute the notion that we have "2 bad losses against Ole Miss."
 
#43
#43
Kansas lost to TCU. Does everyone who lost to Kansas this year get a bad loss?

Ole Miss is not Kansas. UT had two shots at Ole Miss and loss both. Ole Miss is not looking good down the stretch. But if this is your argument stick with it.
 
#44
#44
No offense, but you are not on the selection committee, so who cares whether you consider a loss good or bad. The criteria they use for a bad loss is teams that are not in the top 100 of the RPI. What anybody else thinks about our losses is irrelevant.

Lol then you shouldn't spout your oppinion off either. No offense. You're correct two losses to another bubble team is good. I apologize. Are you on the committee? Do you know that they specifically go by those guidelines? No you aren't so deal with it.
 
Last edited:
#45
#45
Michigan lost to penn state, so by your thery anyone who lost to Michigan it's now considered a bad loss...love the logic.

But they (Michigan) didn't lose to Penn State twice, nor is Ole Miss anywhere as good as Michigan. Just saying if UT could have gotten the split in the Ole Miss/Georgia games I'd feel a lot more at ease with them getting in. The games mentioned by others were one game shots. If you don't see the logic it's okay, just move on.
 
#46
#46
But they (Michigan) didn't lose to Penn State twice, nor is Ole Miss anywhere as good as Michigan. Just saying if UT could have gotten the split in the Ole Miss/Georgia games I'd feel a lot more at ease with them getting in. The games mentioned by others were one game shots. If you don't see the logic it's okay, just move on.

Nobody was asking about the correlation between your ease and the ole miss game, you said ole miss was a bad loss. That's wrong, no matter how you wanna spin it, that is not considered a bad loss. Moving on.
 
#47
#47
Lol then you shouldn't spout your oppinion off either. No offense. You're correct two losses to another bubble team is good. I apologize. Are you on the committee? Do you know that they specifically go by those guidelines? No you aren't so deal with it.

I didn't give an opinion, I gave a fact. These bracket guys and all the other talking heads have told us for years that a bad loss is losing to a team not in the RPI top 100. I would imagine the selection committee has let them know that is the criteria. The committee isn't really all that secretive about what factors they use. They just seem to be secretive on which factors are the most important. At the end of the day, we have 2 bad losses (both to Georgia) according to everybody who does this stuff for a living.
 

VN Store



Back
Top