We'd be better if our players were of the same skill level as Michael Jordan in his prime. These kind of threads are so pointless. OP then makes a pointless observation that can neither be proven or disproven: we'd have a little better record if Turner was still here. Isn't that nice...If's and but's? We'd be better if Grant and Bone had stayed too.
Why not? Kentucky, Duke, Kansas, these teams have 18 year olds repeatedly some in an excel tremendously
I get what you’re saying but it’s irrelevant to the post I responded to...I responded to a post that said that you can’t expect an 18 year old to come in and excel immediately...or something like tht.Do we really have to answer this? While I believe Viscovi will be good, he wasn’t a top 25 player. He also didn’t train in this country, and there is a difference. Give me some examples of international players who were major contributors in their freshman year. Deandre Ayton doesn’t count.
We WOULD have been much better with a HEALTHY Turner. He struggled all year with his shooting and now we know there was a good reason. Even with him unhealthy, he was an asset to team with his defense, assists, and leadership - and a great loss.
Still we have a shot at big tournament - 2nd half at Vandy was promising. Ole Miss Tuesday becomes a big game - every next game from here on is the biggest one.
His learning system at the academy was totally different than the college game. You can palm the ball, shuffle your feet, etc. At the college level, those are turnovers. Also, some of his turnovers are due to lack of physicality, and that will come with Medenwald system.Yes and he has honestly been really good all things considered. He is a high school senior for crying out loud. His prom would still be months away.
Stokes!You expected an 18 year old from another country, who doesn't speak much English to step off the plane and light it up in the first 3 weeks? Most freshmen get preseason camp, the kid is learning on the fly. He's also not in midseason shape like most of the other guys, it takes time. With or without Turner this year was a transition year.
We'd be better if our players were of the same skill level as Michael Jordan in his prime. These kind of threads are so pointless. OP then makes a pointless observation that can neither be proven or disproven: we'd have a little better record if Turner was still here. Isn't that nice...
Expect more from him??? The Uruguayan Stork just dropped him off 3 weeks ago. He’s probably never played this much American style b-ball in his life much less dealing with classes, new teammates, and not having any family or friends around while living 5,000 miles from home. Geez and he’s all of 18yoYes Really. His shot was bad because of his hurt shoulder. Vescovi has not been impressive in the least. He is averaging 2 turnovers per assist. I expected more from him. I know he is on a new team but I thought he had played against High level competition.
Weaker teams? They’ve played Washington, Florida St, VCU, Memphis, Wisconsin, Cincinnati, and LSU plus a team with maybe the best player in the country, Georgia. You must be talking about Auburn’s scheduleWe've been lucky this year to be front-loaded with weaker teams, so our record still looks decent. Maybe the Vandy game was a corner turned? They did play with a lot more confidence.
Stokes was a physical freak at his size and level of development at 18. Was one of the physically strongest players in the SEC the day he stepped on campus.Stokes spoke English, Stokes traveled 4 hours to Knoxville vs 20 hours. Stokes support system was close by. Stokes didn't light the world on fire here.
Stokes was a physical freak at his size and level of development at 18. Was one of the physically strongest players in the SEC the day he stepped on campus.