I Hate Vandy but…

#4
#4
VolFreakJosh said:
How on earth do you miss this call?

View attachment 438784
Click to expand...

I hope Stackhouse goes scorched earth on the officials and SEC office. He has a high enough profile that the league cannot substantively damage him.

The corruption is real and would require burning it to the ground to ever eradicate it. By "burning it to the ground" I mean the FBI putting boosters, refs and school/league officials in federal prison. Will likely never happen. Too much $$ and greed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MississippiVOLS, VOLnBama01, OEF VOL and 2 others
#9
#9
Thunder Good-Oil said:
I don’t think it was reviewable. It was a no call and they played on. They reviewed the next play a second or two later. Bad officiating none the less.
Click to expand...
They did review it. They just looked at the second half of the play. Stute told Stackhouse to request a review because the KY player was out. The refs reviewed the save after the deflection. They made a mistake and reviewed the wrong part of the play. They showed the video of him holding the ball out of bounds, and the still frame during the broadcast and noted that the refs reviewed the wrong part of the play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDave
#10
#10
Stoerner Fumbles said:
They did review it. They just looked at the second half of the play. Stute told Stackhouse to request a review because the KY player was out. The refs reviewed the save after the deflection. They made a mistake and reviewed the wrong part of the play. They showed the video of him holding the ball out of bounds, and the still frame during the broadcast and noted that the refs reviewed the wrong part of the play.
Click to expand...

There wasn’t a whistle on the first part. They reviewed the second part. The part where they blew their whistle and made a call. Stackhouse can request a review, but they didn’t make a call to be reviewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNBV
#12
#12
They're going to have to make some sort of change to the rule, the "they couldn't review that part of the play" when it happened 3 seconds before what they reviewed is BS. I get if they missed it and the play went on with no stoppage you can't go back and review that. But when it's bang-bang like that, surely you can review the entire sequence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLnBama01
#13
#13
Thunder Good-Oil said:
There wasn’t a whistle on the first part. They reviewed the second part. The part where they blew their whistle and made a call. Stackhouse can request a review, but they didn’t make a call to be reviewed.
Click to expand...
That’s not how the rule reads. They can review whether a player stepped out, whistle or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankykong, chuckiepoo and Sudden Impact
#14
#14
VolsSportsFan said:
They're going to have to make some sort of change to the rule, the "they couldn't review that part of the play" when it happened 3 seconds before what they reviewed is BS. I get if they missed it and the play went on with no stoppage you can't go back and review that. But when it's bang-bang like that, surely you can review the entire sequence.
Click to expand...

They already review way more than is necessary. Close games NEVER play out to the final buzzer without multiple stoppages and reviews anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kptvol1452 and chuckiepoo
#16
#16
The official was clearly not in position and could not see that Toppin had the ball.

It's just incompetence, not crooked officiating.
 
#17
#17
McCat said:
The official was clearly not in position and could not see that Toppin had the ball.

It's just incompetence, not crooked officiating.
Click to expand...

He could he not at the very infer he had the ball, did he think it magically went back in? Are 2 refs not watching at that point? You're telling me between the 2 they can't see he was standing out of bound and was touching the ball?

I agree it's incompetence but it's like "you shouldn't be doing this" level of incompetence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLnBama01
#18
#18
McCat said:
The official was clearly not in position and could not see that Toppin had the ball.

It's just incompetence, not crooked officiating.
Click to expand...
Who are you trying to BS.
It would be better to say the official was not looking at the player's feet vs his view was blocked
He is standing in perfect position to make the call, see the ball, and the feet.
He just didn't make the call and ate the whistle.

Ky is the only team that I know of that runs and updates ref stats. Kind of insecure way of thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kptvol1452, VOLnBama01, OEF VOL and 4 others
#19
#19
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Post the rule.

How many seconds can they look back and do they get to review how many seconds it was?
Click to expand...

“InstantReplay/OutofBounds,GoaltendingandBasketInterference-PerRule 11-2.1.e.1 and .3, Instant Replay is permitted to review out of bounds plays and basket interference plays under certain situations:
1. Out of bounds
a. Only permitted in the last two minutes of the second period or in
the last two minutes of any overtime period;
b. Review is only permitted when an out of bounds call has been
made;
c. Officials may determine if the ball went out of bounds and who
caused the ball to be out of bounds.”

They discussed this on ESPN last night. Once an out of bounds call has been made they can review the whole sequence. There is no limit on seconds. Since Toppin was out, the clock should stop earlier and the ball goes to Vandy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLfrombama, VOLnBama01 and chuckiepoo
#20
#20
The refs shouldn’t blow a whistle unless they see something. Too often they anticipate phantom fouls.

The still image looks bad, but in real time it’s not that simple. Plus there’s the When in Doubt the Call Favors Kentucky rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and GiveHim6InSC
#22
#22
Stoerner Fumbles said:
“InstantReplay/OutofBounds,GoaltendingandBasketInterference-PerRule 11-2.1.e.1 and .3, Instant Replay is permitted to review out of bounds plays and basket interference plays under certain situations:
1. Out of bounds
a. Only permitted in the last two minutes of the second period or in
the last two minutes of any overtime period;
b. Review is only permitted when an out of bounds call has been
made;
c. Officials may determine if the ball went out of bounds and who
caused the ball to be out of bounds.”

They discussed this on ESPN last night. Once an out of bounds call has been made they can review the whole sequence. There is no limit on seconds. Since Toppin was out, the clock should stop earlier and the ball goes to Vandy.
Click to expand...

B) They didn’t make a call. They one reviewed was a different out of bounds situation.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top