I Hate Vandy but…

#56
#56
ROFL....you sound like you'd made a great SEC official then. You can't be effin serious. Here it is in real time



Again, tell me with a straight face he can't tell Toppin has the ball even if he can't physically see at the exact moment he's out of bounds that he has the ball. Because if not then he either believes in magic or that Toppin used the force to push the ball back in bounds.

Zero excuse for the ref to have missed that or it not be reviewed. Thanks for the post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfaninky
#58
#58
If that situation had been reversed and it was for a championship that would have been overturned I have no doubt. With possession being the most important thing with that call, it should have been reversed. The replay rules are total bull crap if they couldn’t review that. Everybody in the house knew that should be Vanderbilt basketball. It doesn’t mean vandy would have won but the refs took any chance away significantly with that farce. It’s shameful, the announcers didn’t even go there. Go Vols kick their arse today! Play all out hard all day! I know you all will! Go Vols whip the cats to oblivion! GBO!
The announcers did go there, with obvious lack of vigor, granted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Dog
#67
#67
The ball on that play was already out of bounds. What happened afterwards should be irrelevant

The whistle didn’t blow on the first out of bounds therefore there was nothing to review and the 2nd out of bounds that was whistled is very much relevant. Believe it or not, grass is green and the sky is blue.
 
#68
#68
funny how often incompetent officiating helps KY.
If you are going down that road that refs are corrupt in favor, Kentucky has a lower than average winning % when Pat Adams and Doug Shows have the whistle. So, if there is a ref bias (I don't think there is), it is not in the direction you believe it to be.
 
#69
#69
If you are going down that road that refs are corrupt in favor, Kentucky has a lower than average winning % when Pat Adams and Doug Shows have the whistle. So, if there is a ref bias (I don't think there is), it is not in the direction you believe it to be.

It ain’t just a river in Egypt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfaninky
#72
#72
The whistle didn’t blow on the first out of bounds therefore there was nothing to review and the 2nd out of bounds that was whistled is very much relevant. Believe it or not, grass is green and the sky is blue.[/QUOTE

You’re making a distinction that doesn’t exist. Play stops when a player is out. The announcers were discussing where to set the clock when Toppin caught it because it was so obvious that they would overturn the play.
 

VN Store



Back
Top