If Boise St...

[vols-1]

Except you ignore the previous posts about them having problems getting teams to play them. This whole argument is circular.

No they don't. Oregon and Georgia have played them several times, BSU just refuses to play both in the same year.

 

[spudvol]

Alot say they're "afraid of losing" but fail to remember that they also require much more money to play them. $1 million. Lets see, Montana for half a mill or BSU for $1mill. Its all about the benjamins. Its fun to guess until pesky facts get in the way

If you are referring to the Nebraska negotiation you might want to mention who Nebraska finally scheduled for that game and how much they paid them- Arkansas St and $1 million. Pay BSU $1 million? Outrageous! Pay Arky St $1 million? Sounds fair!

 

[vols-1]

I'm not a Boise St. fan, but they win the games that count. GA this year, VA Tech last year, OU a few years ago in a BCS bowl, all of those teams were heavily favored or at least over-hyped by the media whether they are "top" teams or not.

I'm sure they would join the BigTX or PAC-12 without hesitation if they got an invite. But like mentioned earlier in this thread, they aren't counting on that any time soon.

VA Tech lost to James Madison the next week. And VA Tech was heavily favored. So you could say the same thing about James Madison.

 

[VolsSportsFan]

No they don't. Oregon and Georgia have played them several times, BSU just refuses to play both in the same year.

Ummm..no. You think it's their decision to play both in the same year. You clearly don't know how scheduling works.

 

[grimvol]

VA Tech lost to James Madison the next week. And VA Tech was heavily favored. So you could say the same thing about James Madison.

and VA Tech ended up going to a BCS game as the ACC Champs.

 

[The Ron Mexico]

Boise is missing one very important piece of the magic NCAA money puzzle; lots of filthy rich alumni.
Posted via VolNation Mobile