Yes, Worley is more innaccurate than Crompton and Simms combined. However he makes GOOD decisions. He went up against a very good secondary from the #2 team and all 3 games only forces a few throws. Hasn't thrown a pick yet has he?
Am I saying he deserves to keep playing? NO. However, if Peterman isn't much better and has a problem making decisions, CBJ may be worried of the wheels falling off even sooner than you'd expect.
I'm slightly in the Peterman camp now, but it's not so much because he's better than Worley, so much as I question whether a "game manager" is the right person to have in our situation. When you look at successful "game manager" type QBs, they've normally had a great O-line and running game (check), as well as a spectacular defense (not check).
It's clear that one reason Oregon's D had such an easy time stopping us is because they were 100% focused on stopping the run. They were able to do that only because Worley can't throw deeper than about 15 yards before becoming extremely inaccurate. This leads me to believe that even if Worley is slightly better than Peterman on paper, Peterman might be a better fit for the offense. Of course, I could be wrong.
I'm sure Butch has his reasons and will make the right decision. Worley looked better than Peterman in the first two games, after all. Of course, Peterman was getting garbage time with second stringers in those games, and wasn't throwing it much anyway.
My real question is whether Worley gives us a chance to win against the top tier of competition: Georgia, South Carolina, Bama, and Florida. He might not make mistakes, but unless the running game can take on 80% of the load for the offense, it doesn't seem like we have a shot at the better teams. Then again, maybe he's still our best option.