1. Don Denkinger would have correctly called Jorge Orta out at first base and the Cardinals would have won the '85 series.
2. Andy Kelly would have completed the final pass to Pickens (I think) in the '90 Notre Dame game at Neyland for the winning TD.
3. We would have played D on the final Georgia drive in '01 and I would not have had to sit through that crushing defeat.
Now that I think about it, UT would have lost 0 games in my lifetime.
I thought of that one too. Just when we all thought the effects of the drugs had worn off Lonnie, he used some of those missing brain cells to lose a World Series.
1. 2004/2005 - Ditto on the Erik Ainge injury, which started a crushing chain of events. Not only could we have won the SEC title, but had Erik never been hurt, we'd have never had the QB deal for 05, and probably won the CC, or the NC.
2. We'd have won the 01 SEC title game, so Casey's legacy as one of the all time greats at UT would have been cemented, and even the most closed minded Vol fans had to recognize him.
3. Bruce Pearl would have come here 15 years ago.
I'm going to disagree pretty strongly with #1. I'm not glad Erik got hurt, but I don't think that injury is responsible for all the things you listed.
I didnt say it was responsible for anything... I said it started a crushing chain of events, and it absolutely did. If Erik hadnt gotten hurt, Rick wouldve never seen the field and there wouldnt have been a competition the following spring. Thats a fact Jack.
True, but we might have lost to UK or Vandy in 2004. Rick played pretty well in those games. Also, I'm not sure about the lack of competition. I think Erik's true problem was his inability to grasp the offense when Randy tried to open it up for him in his sophomore season. Thus, although Erik was supposed to be the clear starter, he couldn't manage to complete close to 50% of his passes in scrimmages. Meanwhile, Rick is in the 70% range. I wish that we had continued to run the same offense in 2005 that we ran in 2004, with Ainge as the starter.