"In disputable video evidence" redefined

I am not reading anything into the rule. The rule is simple the call on the field is the judgement of the official who made it. No one else. It his his call to make. He made it. If you think it was wrong that is your opinion. But, once the call is made it is what it is, in this case no one had a better view than the linesman on the field. Thus by rule, the call on the field was correct, and there wasn't enough evidence on the replay video to overturn it.

Yes there was. Watch the replay. The linesman's spot is down near ACS's knees. The ball isn't there. Where was the ball? Don't really know, but it wasn't there. Thus, the overturn was made with indisputable video evidence.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top