hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
No, I'm telling you the media would never have cared about a semiretarded pissant like Neil Bush. The idea that the media has it in for the Bushes is laughable. They consistently laud Jeb, and there's a fair argument that his conduct vis a vis the S&Ls was more egregious than his halfwit brother's. The media picks their heroes, villains, and irrelevants. Under no circumstance would Neil Bush be anything but the latter. I'm also pretty sure that Dan Rostenkowski and Edwin Edwards would be surprised to hear that Democrats get a free ride on corruption. John Ford, Blago, and William Jefferson would also be shocked to find that out.So you're telling me the atmosphere between Agnew's situation and Neil Bush's situation is comparable? Between the Vietnam War, Pentagon Papers, Watergate conspiracies, etc. with the sitting VP and Neil Bush, we're dealing with two separate situations. The sharks in the media are far more interested in feeding on Agnew's situation over Neil Bush's. Again, the media atmosphere was much different between Agnew's time and Neil Bush's. Even within W's eight years, the media went from enabler to lynch mob.