Iraq can thank George Bush

Weak and vulnerable?
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I was thinking the same thing,"weak and vulnerable." ???

However, I do agree with him on his point that fighting two wars made it easier for Iran to get their nuclear weapons program up and running.
 
You really should read and think before you make such dumb comments, it shatters all credibility. I have proven your rants either to be totally false or irrevelant. You remember, the ones like "Bush is the one that hung Hussein" , "Iraq will be a forward base against Iran", and the infamous "well........Iraq had a strong military 20 years ago" comment. All you have are unintelligible remarks.

You speak of "Mercenaries in Iraq". My question is for you, just who chose to hire these contract companies such as Blackwater, Halliburton and Bechtel? I guess Bush could claim he was creating jobs by outsourcing the military.
Why would a service member want to return to Iraq with the traditional military when they can go through Blackwater and make 10X the money?
You have offered no proof, except your own warped views. You have proved only that you are an Obamasheep, incapable of independent thought.

No one said, "Bush hung Saddam". Do you think the US had no influence in the matter? Now, who is the naive fool?

I consider the men and women of our military more than mercenaries, unlike your wannbe security guard buddy. The fact you equate our armed forces personnel with mercenaries, says everything I need to know about you.

trUT, you are correct. I should have followed your example, and not responded to his moronic garbage.
 
You have offered no proof, except your own warped views. You have proved only that you are an Obamasheep, incapable of independent thought.
Nice, you have yet to provide an intelligible remark beyond the name-calling. I have scattered links throughout the board questioning the validity of your assertions and you have the lone response as seen above.

No one said, "Bush hung Saddam".
Just what were you referring to here then?
Originally Posted by SavageOrangeJug 2-3-09
We hung the bad guy.


I consider the men and women of our military more than mercenaries, unlike your wannbe security guard buddy. The fact you equate our armed forces personnel with mercenaries, says everything I need to know about you.
Nice attempt to change the subject and redefine a new villain. So you believe ex-military now working for Blackwater are not “professional solders”? Just what is the politically correct term then?
I am going to give you an easy question. Of course, your first 2 guess don’t count. Just whom do you think trained my friend to be able to take that job? What is the likelihood that he has been in Iraq before?

trUT, you are correct. I should have followed your example, and not responded to his moronic garbage.
Do you always talk to people not in the conversation hoping for their blessings or approval?
 
please explain, i have no problem answering for my actions.

you called professional soldiers "mercenaries" and since TRUT is a field grade officer in the US Army, he is, by all accounts, a professional soldier.

He certainly doesn't need me to speak for him, but I can assure you that being called a mercenary is an insult to any member of the US Armed Forces.
 
you called professional soldiers "mercenaries" and since TRUT is a company grade officer in the US Army, he is, by all accounts, a professional soldier.

He certainly doesn't need me to speak for him, but I can assure you that being called a mercenary is an insult to any member of the US Armed Forces.
FYP. I would appreciate the promotion, though.

Other than that, spot on MG.
 
you called professional soldiers "mercenaries" and since TRUT is a field grade officer in the US Army, he is, by all accounts, a professional soldier.

He certainly doesn't need me to speak for him, but I can assure you that being called a mercenary is an insult to any member of the US Armed Forces.

Well I see your point. I meant no disprespect in any way to trUT. I see the fallacy in referring to my Bud as a "professional soldier" despite having 15 yrs service before getting out and then entertaining his current venture. Atleast from my perspective the definition of a "professional soldier" is broad and should have been specifically definied.

I am here to question the norm and have no problem admiting when I am wrong.
 
Last edited:
We are occupation forces. Happens after every war.

I know you liberals really want the USA to be defeated. Sorry, it didn't happen.

Total uninformed BS. Please, for once, get a clue. I know many you would label as liberal that are as glad as you are we won in Iraq. Me being one of them.
 
They can also thank him for thousands of dead, innocent, women and children because they had "proof" Saddam had everything to do with 9/11. If you have the impression of EVERY ONE against Bush wanted us to lose, you are lost. I have an uncle and a sister-in-law in the crossfire as we speak.

Let me guess, you know more than all the "liberal morons" on CNN and Fox.

Were we helping communism? Why aren't we helping other communist countries? No sarcasm inteded, just a question
 
Last edited:
They can also thank him for thousands of dead, innocent, women and children because they had "proof" Saddam had everything to do with 9/11. If you have the impression of EVERY ONE against Bush wanted us to lose, you are lost. I have an uncle and a sister-in-law in the crossfire as we speak.

Let me guess, you know more than all the "liberal morons" on CNN and Fox.

Were we helping communism? Why aren't we helping other communist countries? No sarcasm inteded, just a question

Was this imtentionally wrong on every front?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Total uninformed BS. Please, for once, get a clue. I know many you would label as liberal that are as glad as you are we won in Iraq. Me being one of them.

QUICK! How many liberals in the public eye have you heard say the word, "victory"? Including that wannabe dictator in the White House.

I await your list of names.
 

VN Store



Back
Top